Index:
[thread]
[date]
[subject]
[author]
From: Asma Chandani <asc2106@columbia.edu>
To : <cpc@emoglen.law.columbia.edu>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 08:34:05 -0400
RE: Lawyers Seek Pass From Privacy Law
I'm not familiar with the GLB Act, but from what I gather, the concern
is that this Act would actually preempt state privacy acts that may
confer more rights on clients? And what sorts of privacy rights will be
compromised here? Clue me in?
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-cpc@emoglen.law.columbia.edu
[mailto:owner-cpc@emoglen.law.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Jeremy Robinson
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 8:27 AM
To: CPC@emoglen.law.columbia.edu
Subject: Lawyers Seek Pass From Privacy Law
Lawyers Seek Pass From Privacy Law
Legal Times
Enough already! That's what the ABA and others will argue Thursday as
they
ask the D.C. Circuit to rule that the FTC has no right to hold lawyers
to
privacy provisions in the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act. The litigation is the
latest sign of lawyers' fervent belief that state laws should hold the
strongest sway over their professional conduct. Says legal ethics
counsel
Michael Frisch, "When the federal government threatens to impinge on the
way lawyers do business, there is always going to be resistance."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Computers, Privacy, and the Constitution mailing list
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Computers, Privacy, and the Constitution mailing list
Index:
[thread]
[date]
[subject]
[author]