Computers, Privacy & the Constitution

View   r4  >  r3  ...
ElizabethDoisyFirstPaper 4 - 15 Apr 2009 - Main.EbenMoglen
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="FirstPaper"
Elizabeth Doisy, First Paper
Line: 42 to 42
 -- ElizabethDoisy - 09 Mar 2009
Added:
>
>
  • Seems to me a reasonably comprehensive and certainly clear summary of relatively accessible facts. The comparison between China and the US serves some limited purposes, if only to make US Americans feel better about not having gotten everything quite as wrong as the Chinese Communist Party, but it's not clear to me that comparison is apt, except on the absolutely a-cultural basis of "human rights" comparison. Mobility of persons, considered as an abstract topic, has a somewhat different history over the last, say, two thousand years in China and in North America. To begin only from the current state of constitutional law and residence regulation is to make an implicit assertion that history is irrelevant. I'd like at least an argument about that.
 
 
<--/commentPlugin-->
Added:
>
>
 
META TOPICMOVED by="EbenMoglen" date="1239825720" from="CompPrivConst.TWikiElizabethDoisyFirstPaper" to="CompPrivConst.ElizabethDoisyFirstPaper"

Revision 4r4 - 15 Apr 2009 - 21:49:57 - EbenMoglen
Revision 3r3 - 15 Apr 2009 - 20:02:00 - EbenMoglen
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM