Computers, Privacy & the Constitution

View   r1
EricaPedersenJournal 1 - 25 Mar 2020 - Main.EricaPedersen
Line: 1 to 1
Added:
>
>
META TOPICPARENT name="StudentJournal"

EricaPedersen's Journal

March 25, 2020

My first entry in this journal will be brief as I am still working to get my work together during this strange and difficult time. I am trying to stay hopeful that we will emerge from this pandemic awakened to the things that matter most in life and, as a society, finally begin working towards the structural changes that have been necessary for a long time (rebuilding our welfare system and obtaining universal healthcare in particular). However, the pessimist in me (perhaps fed by my own illnesses) worries that these events will only reinforce toxic forms of individualism and lead to nihilistic and short-sighted responses. The irony is that, to keep myself going, I need to avoid thinking about the long term as much as possible right now... avoid the crippling spirals. I am trying to find a new balance between helping my family members through their own hardships and adjustments to online technologies (and safety measures), while staying as productive as possible.

The readings that stood out to me this week were those related to the electronic surveillance of counsel. The breadth of the scope of the government's monitoring abilities, particularly under Title III and pursuant to BOP regulations, is extremely concerning. I was also astonished to read about the use of North Carolina's nolle prosequi law to attempt to indefinitely defer prosecution in Klopfer. To hold this threat over the head of an individual who has not been found guilty by a jury (and for a misdemeanor, at that) seems so facially oppressive and tyrannical, not to mention a clear violation of the Sixth Amendment.

I have also been closely watching your radar for articles and researching governments' use of surveillance technologies to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic. I am especially concerned about the Trump Administration's ongoing discussions with Google and Facebook regarding the aggregation of massive datasets on individuals around the country as a means of tracking the spread of the virus. Given that researchers are still identifying new symptoms and incubation dynamics, I simply do not see how such a data analysis effort would in fact respect principles of data minimization. It also seems impossible for a data set which is fundamentally reliant on geolocation information to, in fact, be anonymized (especially now that many of us are sheltering in place at our home addresses). An environment of fear, uncertainty, and the necessity for speed is not conducive to thoughtful and restrained public-private partnerships. I worry that new measures taken during this pandemic will quickly become a new normal, further reducing what is left of our "reasonable expectations of privacy" and open the door to increasingly pervasive surveillance by both our government and tech companies, allegedly for the public good.



Revision 1r1 - 25 Mar 2020 - 22:22:30 - EricaPedersen
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM