Computers, Privacy & the Constitution

View   r7  >  r6  ...
JudyWangFirstPaper 7 - 30 Apr 2017 - Main.EbenMoglen
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="FirstPaper"
All eyes are on Apple as it takes on the US government in possibly the highest-profile fight in privacy and technology. Posing as a defender of civil liberties and customer privacy, Apple is vociferously defying a federal judge’s order to assist the FBI in its investigation of an alleged terrorist’s iPhone. Under its rationale, a loss to the US government in this case would lead to a dangerous precedent of Apple compromising its own security system and “undermin[ing] decades of security advances that protect [] customers”; assistance to the government would be equivalent to creating a “master key.” Furthermore, such a move would not only jeopardize security concerns vis-à-vis the American government and people, according to Apple CEO Tim Cook and other Apple officials, but create a watershed loss of security for those living under authoritarian governments. If the United States courts could compel security compromises, what is to stop Apple from being forced to cooperate with surveillance-happy governments such as Russia and China?

Revision 7r7 - 30 Apr 2017 - 22:11:13 - EbenMoglen
Revision 6r6 - 22 Mar 2017 - 13:36:18 - EbenMoglen
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM