Computers, Privacy & the Constitution

View   r4  >  r3  ...
MattDavisRatner-FirstPaper 4 - 15 Mar 2009 - Main.TheodoreSmith
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebPreferences"

Individual Privacy: A Social Construction?

Line: 30 to 30
 I have been having a difficult time making this as cohesive as I had hoped. The idea that social knowledge is far more accurate than we believe because of our "uniqueness" bias has so many interrelated factors that this approach may not have been the most effective. A focus on the "everyone must have privacy for anyone to have privacy" may be a more efficient seed to start this discussion.

-- MattDavisRatner - 11 Mar 2009

Added:
>
>

I agree with your above comment. The second section in particular seems out of place - the first and the third go together well, but I feel like by the end it hasn't really addressed the thesis you expressed in the introduction. If you want to keep your uniqueness thesis, you may want to look into psych research, as there is probably extant work on the topic (though you may not want to use "uniqueness bias", as this term has already been coined in another context: http://psp.sagepub.com/cgi/content/refs/29/5/559)

-- TheodoreSmith - 15 Mar 2009

 
 
<--/commentPlugin-->

Revision 4r4 - 15 Mar 2009 - 18:23:32 - TheodoreSmith
Revision 3r3 - 11 Mar 2009 - 05:13:34 - MattDavisRatner
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM