Computers, Privacy & the Constitution

View   r11  >  r10  ...
MatthewEckmanSecondPaper 11 - 30 May 2009 - Main.KateVershov
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebPreferences"

Correction

Line: 103 to 103
 Another argument that sticks with me is the argument about regulation. Most pro-market people want government to be effective but limited in exercising authority over the economy, and I see many problems with asking the state to regulate the companies who provide it with intelligence/law enforcement data. So there's the cronyism argument.

-- MahaAtal - 20 May 2009

Added:
>
>

Dana and Ted - you guys have provided some really great analysis here and I'm particularly fond of Dana's belief that a person is more than just the goods he consumes. But, I see a broader problem with Matt's vision. Simply put, I think he irrationally trusts the government to do right by him. Good luck with that Matt. Glad you're not bothered by the massive government databases or AT&T's dump of emails and phone conversations into the government's lap. At least, not until for whatever reason someone decides to investigate you. Or do you really believe you're immune from that? You never do the wrong things? You think the government doesn't make mistakes? You think that by the time you're old enough to be vetted for the Supreme Court, your entire internet history will magically disappear? The real problem here is that you neither have a grasp on the history of totalitarianism nor do you possess an imagination that would allow you to see past the things directly in front of you.

-- KateVershov - 30 May 2009

 
 
<--/commentPlugin-->

Revision 11r11 - 30 May 2009 - 08:08:07 - KateVershov
Revision 10r10 - 20 May 2009 - 12:44:20 - MahaAtal
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM