| META TOPICPARENT | name="StudentJournal" |
|---|
To better engage with your ideas, it would be helpful to have a clear picture of your own views about proper methods of constitutional interpretation. You have made a few stray remarks critiquing various forms of originalism, and have made other interpretive points (e.g. about clausification), but I do not recall hearing you describe the key principles of your own approach (and why you think that approach is correct). In particular, I am interested in learning your views on the broader, higher-order interpretive debates (e.g. to what extent is your approach originalist or not?). Could you give me/the class such an account, or point me in the direction of any of your writings that does so?
|