|
ClaireOSullivan-SecondPaper 13 - 23 May 2008 - Main.ClaireOSullivan
|
| |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="WebPreferences" |
|---|
| |
<
< | Final Version | >
> | Rape and the Criminal Justice System: The problem of underreporting | | | Introduction | |
<
< | Rape presents a particular problem for our justice system. The subjective elements of the crime, the frequent lack of evidence outside the testimony of the parties involved, and the stereotypes and stigma that surround it all make it and especially difficult issue. Clearly these issues arise in some degree in the adjudication of all crimes, but rape generally exaggerates all these problems, particularly in cases of acquaintance rape where evidence of significant physical force is lacking. An intermediate misdemeanour charge, which entailed education and sensitivity training instead of jail time, would be a better method than either full acquittal or a full rape conviction for dealing with acquaintance rapes that are based on a mistaken belief of consent. | | | | |
<
< | Rape and the Law | >
> | Most rapes go unreported. There are no reliable statistics to back this up, because it is impossible to obtain reliable statistics on something that no one wants to admit happened. I can only back up my assertion with statistics drawn from personal experience: three female friends raped, zero police reports, zero prosecutions. Why is this? These were all educated, well-adjusted young women. They knew their rights, and they knew what happened was against the law. Yet not one of them even considered going to the police. The criminal justice system is the most powerful tool our society has at its disposal for combating rape; however, it is not meaningful if a large percentage of rapes are going unreported. We need to ask: why don’t women report rapes and sexual assaults? | | | | |
<
< | Rape is Endemic and Under-Reported
Rape laws differ widely. In some states, there must have been physical force or the threat of physical force for a rape charge. Other jurisdictions hold that a lack of consent warrants a rape charge, whether or not there was physical force employed. In Canada, the victim's statement that she did not give consent is sufficient to shift the burden to the offender to prove otherwise. My contention that there is a particular problem with rape and the law is based on the disparity between the estimated number of rapes committed and the number that are reported. Clearly accurate numbers are impossible to get on this issue, but it is generally accepted that a significant percentage of rapes go unreported. The reasons for this are shame and guilt over the incident, as well as the perception that reporting the rape will be taxing and useless. | >
> | Why Women Don't Report Gender Violence | | | | |
<
< | The Criminal Justice System Deals Poorly with Rape
My particular interest here is in male-female acquaintance rapes, which are much more difficult to deal with than stranger rape. In these cases, there is rarely any evidence outside the testimony of the two parties, since any evidence of rape will generally also be consistent with consensual sexual activity. This makes it easy for both parties to tell extremely divergent stories of the incident. However, an even more difficult hurdle is that the man and woman involved may have genuinely different impressions of what happened. There is therefore a subjective element to this type of rape that makes it especially ill-suited to be dealt with by a justice system that attempts to establish the objective truth by examining evidence and deciding on credibility. The jury has to pick which of the narratives to believe, both of which may be subjectively true, with the following result: either men who do not believe they did anything wrong are convicted of rape, or the claims of women who did not consent to sexual activity are dismissed. | >
> | Blaming the Victim | | | | |
<
< | A Possible Alternative | >
> | Women who are raped cannot escape the fact that they will be blamed for it; furthermore, many victims genuinely feel that they are partly to blame. Thanks to rape shield laws, women are generally not prosecuted along with (or instead of) their rapists anymore. That does not mean, though, that the woman will not be prosecuted by the media in a high profile case, or by friends, family and acquaintances when the case is not sensational enough for media attention. Rape is frequently a he-said she-said situation. A conviction rests on the woman’s credibility, and her credibility is undermined if she is seen as somehow contributing to the situation. Prosecutors know this, and prefer not to take cases where the woman has acted in a way that the media or the jury would see as making her culpable. Even if a woman can move past her own feelings of shame and guilt over the incident, she faces the uphill battle of convincing a prosecutor that the jury will find her credible and convincing. | | | | |
<
< | Gender stereotypes are the underlying problem
Traditional ideas about sex roles and the socialization of the two genders are at the heart of acquaintance rape. First there is the idea (held by both men and women) that women are supposed to display initial resistance to sexual contact, and men are supposed to act aggressively in response to this. This can result in a woman’s resistance being taken for coyness. Then there is the idea that if a woman is not consenting, she should attempt to fight off the offender physically. Firstly, men tend to be larger and stronger than women, who may as a result perceive fighting back physically to be useless. Secondly, this concept is based in a very male idea of conflict behaviour: women (for any number of biological or social reasons) are less likely than men to respond in kind to physical aggression; they are more likely to try to avoid escalating the situation. These factors add up to a situation where a man can fail to perceive a woman’s lack of consent, despite her belief that she is making it clear. | >
> | Sexism is the Underlying Problem | | | | |
<
< | Mandatory Education to Combat the Problem
If there is a genuine mistake about consent, it is unjust to punish the rapist. This can happen under a law like Canada’s, which says that if the victim was incapable of giving consent or made any indication of lack of consent, mistake regarding consent cannot be used as a defence. However, it is also unsatisfactory to acquit the rapist, because he obviously engaged in sexual conduct that was unwelcome. Since gender-based miscommunication is the source of this problem, the logical way forward is to work towards eradicating the ideas and misconceptions that underlie it. An intermediate charge that could be used in non-forcible acquaintance rapes might provide a viable alternative. A conviction under that charge would ideally entail education and sensitivity training for the defendant. The training would focus on eradicating the traditional ideas that lead to acquaintance rape based on miscommunication. Ideally this would impress on the offender the seriousness of what occurred, and prevent a recurrence, without the stigma and severe punishment of a rape conviction. The victim would also be vindicated in some sense because the court is recognizing that what the offender did was wrong.
There are a lot of potential problems with this idea. Training and education are expensive, and may meet with resistance from students who do not perceive it as necessary. The most serious risk is that juries could abuse it to excuse acquaintance rape; offenders who ignored a lack of consent in bad faith might escape punishment. It would have to be made clear that there is a high standard – the charge can only be made where there is convincing evidence that the perpetrator had a genuine, objectively reasonable, good faith belief that the victim had consented, and there is no evidence of physical force. | >
> | Underlying this problem, and violence against women in general, are traditional views about gender roles and the general sexism that pervades our culture. In terms of sexual crimes, these ideas come into play in several different ways. The basic idea is that male sexuality is something that women must manage and control.[1] If a woman is raped, it is because she put herself in a situation where she could not maintain control. This theory of sexual relations comes into play most often in cases of acquaintance rape. Where a woman has had prior sexual relations with the offender, has been drinking, or engaged in sexual conduct before withdrawing consent, the judgement made by society, and often by the victim herself, is that she should have known better. | | | | |
<
< | Conclusion
Despite these problems, I think this idea could help combat both the occurrence of acquaintance rape and the failure to report it, by providing education for offenders and deterrence for others, as well as making full acquittals in cases of date rape less likely. It could also limit the number of men who are convicted of rape unjustly. Finally, it could help to counter the shame and guilt that is associated with victims of acquaintance rape by assuring women that, even in cases where the offender is an acquaintance and physical violence was largely absent, their lack of consent will be respected by the law.
-- ClaireOSullivan - 31 Mar 2008
| >
> | This also applies to violence against women in a broader sense. Women are held responsible for controlling male sexuality as part of their responsibility for maintaining the family unit. Women are the traditional guardians of the home, and the nuclear family that is integral to the societal structure. In cases of domestic violence, women are often too afraid to report assaults or leave the situation in which they are being assaulted. However, there is also a sense of shame or at least responsibility. Nancy Berns studied the characterization of domestic violence in women’s magazines, and found that the stories were framed as women solving a private problem. [2] Women are responsible for maintaining marriages and family units, the building blocks of a capitalist society. If something is amiss in the family, society is quick to blame the woman as the appointed guardian of the home. The woman also blames herself. This is the source of the shame and judgment associated with domestic violence, as well as the tendency to view this violence as a private affair. | | | | |
<
< |
- This is an interesting essay, Claire, and I appreciate the vibrancy of the conversation it started, which is a good sign of the effectiveness of the writing.
| | | | |
<
< |
- But your legal thinking here is unfortunately naive. It is not juries who determine either the under-prosecution of acquaintance rape or the underreporting of rape as a whole. You cannot significantly change prosecutorial behavior by adding another sexual misdemeanor to the "toolkit." Because we're not going to recriminalize "fornication," we can't make the sex itself a misdemeanor--some additional element must be proven. Prosecutors have sexual battery misdemeanors available in every modern penal code with which to charge less than felony rape or sexual crime if they want to. You might find it useful to look at the scheme in N.Y. Penal Law section 130, including the general provisions concerning consent, and the Class A misdemeanor called "forcible touching" which is New York's relevant offense already available.
| >
> | Addressing the Problem | | | | |
<
< |
- The problems with using this tool are twofold, and they lie away from your essay's focus. In the first place, the political moron-show that is public discussion of criminal justice matters has been scaring the booboisie sick about "sex offenders" for years now, and has been politically rewarded for passing statutes that horrendously burden the constitutional rights and daily lives of "sex offenders," which can include those convicted of the sexual battery misdemeanors. It's hard to get people to plead guilty to something that's going to destroy their lives if they don't think they did anything wrong and they have social and economic resources with which to go to trial. In the second place, and more importantly, prosecutors don't want to go to trial in misdemeanors that are simply "he said, she said" evidence--that's even worse for the prosecutor than the felony is, because the standard of proof is just as high, but if you win all you did was get a misdemeanor conviction--which doesn't help your stats at all--and if you lose you've wasted as much time as you'd have spent on trying the felony.
| >
> | Education in the Long Term | | | | |
<
< |
- So the real issue is whether you can get the offender to plead to the misdemeanor by threatening to take him to trial on the felony, which if successful will result in his being sent away to be raped by somebody else once he gets to prison. Prosecutors don't understand themselves as intake officers for psychotherapy and behavior modification, you understand? They're public servant warriors whose task it is to use the People's force to introduce offenders to the "correctional system" through guilty plea or trial verdict. Those they cannot convict by threat or force they do not want to charge. Sex crimes units are not special anti-patriarchy holistic intervention centers: they are run by and contain the same well-bred wolves who succeed elsewhere in the pack.
| >
> | The only way to change deeply ingrained societal beliefs is a gradual program of education at every level. Suffice to say that encouraging women to sign pledges “guarding” their virginity and “saving” themselves for marriage does nothing to eradicate the view of women as responsible for controlling and limiting sex. However, Michelle Fine has studied programs that encourage abstinence and those that engage with teen sexuality, and found that both tend to encourage this view.[3] A reconfiguring of sexual education so that it does not cast the gender roles in this way would be a strong step in the right direction. | | | | |
<
< |
- I would freely concede that the "Drug Courts" bullshit offers the sort of picture that might convince you that you are on the right track here, which means that naivete has spread to people supposedly older and wiser than you are in the ways of this sick-making "system" of ours. But adversary criminal justice in the contemporary style is not a good place to look for social therapeutics, and you can't graft them together bough to stock.
| >
> | Criminal Justice Reform in the Short Term | | | | |
>
> | However, as long as these beliefs still exist, and women still feel open to judgment and criticism when they are the victims of violence, the criminal justice system needs to be more responsive to their needs. One way is to give judges more discretion to limit media access to courtroom proceedings and documents until the trial is over. Judges do have the ability to exclude people from the courtroom, but in rape cases it should be the norm unless justice demands otherwise. This is a contentious issue, but it would protect the victim’s privacy and limit the media’s ability to put the victims of gender violence on trial. There should also be more interaction between criminal justice and social services, in order to provide support to the victims of gender violence if they do decide to report the assaults, including access to shelters and health services. Programs attempting to create a community-based response to sexual violenceare a good sign that this is the direction in which the system is going. Finally, the punishment of offenders should have an educational component, to try to target the sexism that underlies gender violence. | | | | |
>
> | Conclusion | | | | |
<
< |
- The sad truth of the matter is that we are a society in which a woman somewhere is beaten, in her home, every few minutes. Husbands commit forcible rape upon their wives, every single day. Any adolescent girl who through choice or circumstance associates unsupervised with adult males--including all too often relatives such as uncles and cousins, or co-resident sexual partners of her mother or other relatives--is likely to find herself initiated in what is at best a semi-consensual setting, and long before the age of consent. Young adult women report rates of abuse from puberty on that we should take seriously and be horrified about; every year I meet law students whose lives have been harmed, whose trauma has been severe. This society tolerates levels of brutality to and sexual mistreatment of women that should be a source of militant determination to everyone who lives here. Instead, we excuse ourselves by pointing out that few parts of the world are substantially better and many are inexpressibly worse. That excuse is obnoxious crap. But by the same token, we aren't exactly being realistic when we sit wondering how to use the criminal justice process to deal with the cases of mistaken understanding of consent while all the rest of the brutality goes on unchecked around us. You are right that we have work to do in the culture. But we should be designing that work with a view of the problem as a whole, not merely any part of it.
http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/bestoftv/2008/04/22/mg.morrow.eiglarsh.int.cnn?iref=mpvideosview
-- JosephMacias - 23 Apr 2008 | >
> | Women fail to report gender-based violence because traditional ideas of gender roles and put them in the position of having to defend their allegations and their own behaviour. If women do not report the violence against them, then the reforms to rape and domestic violence law cannot help the people who need them the most. Measures to increase punishment for sex offenders disproportionately punish those offenders without addressing the problem of unreported gender violence. This is a problem that can only be solved through the gradual reform of attitudes towards gender violence. The issue is clearly bigger than the criminal justice system, but it has a role to play. | | | | |
>
> | [1] Fine, M. and Carney, S. (2001) Women, Gender, and the Law : Toward a Feminist Rethinking of Responsibility. Unger, R. (Ed) Handbook of Psychology and Gender. NY: McMillan? Publishers, 388-409. | | | | |
>
> | [2] Berns, Nancy. "My Problem and How I Solved It": Domestic Violence in Women's Magazines The Sociological Quarterly, Vol. 40, No. 1 (Winter, 1999), pp. 85-108 | | | | |
<
< | | | | \ No newline at end of file | |
>
> | [3] Fine, M. and McClelland? , S. (2006) Sexuality education and desire: Still missing after all these years. Harvard Educational Review. Fall 2006, 76, 3, 297 – 338. |
|
|
ClaireOSullivan-SecondPaper 12 - 23 Apr 2008 - Main.JosephMacias
|
| |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="WebPreferences" |
|---|
Final Version | | |
- The sad truth of the matter is that we are a society in which a woman somewhere is beaten, in her home, every few minutes. Husbands commit forcible rape upon their wives, every single day. Any adolescent girl who through choice or circumstance associates unsupervised with adult males--including all too often relatives such as uncles and cousins, or co-resident sexual partners of her mother or other relatives--is likely to find herself initiated in what is at best a semi-consensual setting, and long before the age of consent. Young adult women report rates of abuse from puberty on that we should take seriously and be horrified about; every year I meet law students whose lives have been harmed, whose trauma has been severe. This society tolerates levels of brutality to and sexual mistreatment of women that should be a source of militant determination to everyone who lives here. Instead, we excuse ourselves by pointing out that few parts of the world are substantially better and many are inexpressibly worse. That excuse is obnoxious crap. But by the same token, we aren't exactly being realistic when we sit wondering how to use the criminal justice process to deal with the cases of mistaken understanding of consent while all the rest of the brutality goes on unchecked around us. You are right that we have work to do in the culture. But we should be designing that work with a view of the problem as a whole, not merely any part of it.
| |
<
< | | >
> |
http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/bestoftv/2008/04/22/mg.morrow.eiglarsh.int.cnn?iref=mpvideosview
-- JosephMacias - 23 Apr 2008 | | | |
|
|
ClaireOSullivan-SecondPaper 11 - 20 Apr 2008 - Main.EbenMoglen
|
| |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="WebPreferences" |
|---|
Final Version | | | -- ClaireOSullivan - 31 Mar 2008
| |
<
< | I do agree with your thesis: "Rape is a problem that our justice system is not well equipped to address." And I would like to suggest some names for the tort you propose: "Moving too fast;" "Disrespecting an acquaintance;" "Violating Title VII with a potential co-worker;" "Stealing bases." | | | | |
<
< | I don't mean to disrespect the real problem: social intercourses get interpreted differently by their participants. But the fact that intercourses (sexual or otherwise) contain misunderstandings does not, by itself, justify the erection of state power and its thrusting upon one party the other's understanding. "Misunderstanding" should not be made a tort. | >
> |
- This is an interesting essay, Claire, and I appreciate the vibrancy of the conversation it started, which is a good sign of the effectiveness of the writing.
| | | | |
<
< | I think that education and therapy are more properly applied preemptively, as they currently are. Assuming that our goal is to reduce the number of relationships that end in accusations of rape, we should help EVERYONE, men and women alike, learn to send and read signals better. | >
> |
- But your legal thinking here is unfortunately naive. It is not juries who determine either the under-prosecution of acquaintance rape or the underreporting of rape as a whole. You cannot significantly change prosecutorial behavior by adding another sexual misdemeanor to the "toolkit." Because we're not going to recriminalize "fornication," we can't make the sex itself a misdemeanor--some additional element must be proven. Prosecutors have sexual battery misdemeanors available in every modern penal code with which to charge less than felony rape or sexual crime if they want to. You might find it useful to look at the scheme in N.Y. Penal Law section 130, including the general provisions concerning consent, and the Class A misdemeanor called "forcible touching" which is New York's relevant offense already available.
| | | | |
<
< | -- AndrewGradman - 31 Mar 2008 | >
> |
- The problems with using this tool are twofold, and they lie away from your essay's focus. In the first place, the political moron-show that is public discussion of criminal justice matters has been scaring the booboisie sick about "sex offenders" for years now, and has been politically rewarded for passing statutes that horrendously burden the constitutional rights and daily lives of "sex offenders," which can include those convicted of the sexual battery misdemeanors. It's hard to get people to plead guilty to something that's going to destroy their lives if they don't think they did anything wrong and they have social and economic resources with which to go to trial. In the second place, and more importantly, prosecutors don't want to go to trial in misdemeanors that are simply "he said, she said" evidence--that's even worse for the prosecutor than the felony is, because the standard of proof is just as high, but if you win all you did was get a misdemeanor conviction--which doesn't help your stats at all--and if you lose you've wasted as much time as you'd have spent on trying the felony.
| | | | |
>
> |
- So the real issue is whether you can get the offender to plead to the misdemeanor by threatening to take him to trial on the felony, which if successful will result in his being sent away to be raped by somebody else once he gets to prison. Prosecutors don't understand themselves as intake officers for psychotherapy and behavior modification, you understand? They're public servant warriors whose task it is to use the People's force to introduce offenders to the "correctional system" through guilty plea or trial verdict. Those they cannot convict by threat or force they do not want to charge. Sex crimes units are not special anti-patriarchy holistic intervention centers: they are run by and contain the same well-bred wolves who succeed elsewhere in the pack.
| | | | |
>
> |
- I would freely concede that the "Drug Courts" bullshit offers the sort of picture that might convince you that you are on the right track here, which means that naivete has spread to people supposedly older and wiser than you are in the ways of this sick-making "system" of ours. But adversary criminal justice in the contemporary style is not a good place to look for social therapeutics, and you can't graft them together bough to stock.
| | | | |
<
< | Claire isn't advocating the creation of a tort. I think she's trying to find a middle ground within criminal law between the approach of Canada, which may over-criminalize such 'misunderstandings', and the approach of jurisdictions which refuse to recognize non-forcible rape at all. This doesn't preclude preemptive education, but we get plenty of that in high school and college and it's barely taken seriously, i think precisely because non-forcible rape is often chalked up to a simple misunderstanding. However, to call non-forcible rape a misunderstanding is oversimplified because in many instances the perpetrator may understand perfectly well the signals being given, but may know that that he (or she?) can pretty much get away with it. I have no idea how criminal law should deal with that problem. I think this will be a good topic to grapple with. | >
> |
- The sad truth of the matter is that we are a society in which a woman somewhere is beaten, in her home, every few minutes. Husbands commit forcible rape upon their wives, every single day. Any adolescent girl who through choice or circumstance associates unsupervised with adult males--including all too often relatives such as uncles and cousins, or co-resident sexual partners of her mother or other relatives--is likely to find herself initiated in what is at best a semi-consensual setting, and long before the age of consent. Young adult women report rates of abuse from puberty on that we should take seriously and be horrified about; every year I meet law students whose lives have been harmed, whose trauma has been severe. This society tolerates levels of brutality to and sexual mistreatment of women that should be a source of militant determination to everyone who lives here. Instead, we excuse ourselves by pointing out that few parts of the world are substantially better and many are inexpressibly worse. That excuse is obnoxious crap. But by the same token, we aren't exactly being realistic when we sit wondering how to use the criminal justice process to deal with the cases of mistaken understanding of consent while all the rest of the brutality goes on unchecked around us. You are right that we have work to do in the culture. But we should be designing that work with a view of the problem as a whole, not merely any part of it.
| | | | |
<
< | -- VishalA? - 01 Apr 2008 | | | | |
<
< | Andrew, I think that having an intermediate misdemeanor charge such as the one Claire suggests may serve as a deterrent or a self-policing mechanism (a preemptive strike, as you put it). Knowing that they may face such a charge, individuals about to engage in sexual conduct will be urged to ask themselves: “Am I absolutely sure that there is consent here?” If one party is drunk, or in some other way incapacitated, there will be incentive to refrain from sexual conduct. | | | | |
<
< | As Claire said, the subjective element of sexual conduct/relations makes it difficult to address through traditional legal avenues. Perhaps we could use the law--through potential punishment/sanctions--to encourage individuals to police their own sexual behavior? Since a misdemeanor charge would possibly be easier to charge and convict on, individuals may be more likely to make sure that they aren’t engaging in date rape. Claire, I’m excited to see how this idea pans out. | | | | |
<
< | -- MinaNasseri - 01 Apr 2008
Claire, i think that this is an excellent idea, and, as i mentioned to you before, it is very close to how i was originally going to frame my topic. I've since broadened my topic so as to create less overlap. But, i'm thinking i'll link your topic to mine, because it's a good example of the analysis that i think should occur more often wherever there are gender biases in the law. You get at the heart of the problem, and think outside of the box to create a solution. All in all, very good idead.
Unfortunately, and it is with great dismay that i say this, i have to at least partially agree with gradman. If you concede that the root of the problem is in socialized gender miscommunications which play a role in how both genders communicate in the bedroom, i hardly see it as fair to penalize one gender for a mistake both contribute to. I'm not sure i see any better way to do it (maybe better sex ed in HS dealing with issues like this), but it seems like blaming the individual for a mistake created by the group, if not society as a whole.
I don't know. I like the analysis. I just don't know how well tailored to the problem the solution really is.
-- OluwafemiMorohunfola - 04 Apr 2008
Thanks everyone for your feedback. I do see why it is unsatisfying to identify a one-sided solution for a problem that I've framed as two-sided. I've tried to address this in my final version; however it also seems to me that, since the problem still comes down to unwanted sexual contact being imposed on the victim, it makes more sense to put the onus on the aggressor to change their behaviour and mindset. Holding women responsible for re-framing their lack of consent (say, by fighting back physically) to make sure that the man will understand seems dangerous to me. Anyway I find this to be a very difficult issue (which was why I wanted to spend some time thinking about it by writing this paper) and I appreciate everyone's input.
-- ClaireOSullivan - 04 Apr 2008
This is a really interesting piece. This may not be the point of your paper but I got left wondering what the gender stereotypes are which lead to acquaintance rape. I don't know if you have the space or the inclination to deal with that. It could be a whole other paper though. Very interesting to read. I wonder what the male perspective on this reform would be. Maybe it's Femi's reaction that one gender should not be penalized for the miscommunication. Should women undergo some sort of therapy so withdrawn consent does not reoccur? Just an idea.
-- JulianBaez - 04 Apr 2008
Feminine timidity regarding sex isn't an inherent aspect of women that society should intervene and correct. This timidity, to the extent that it does exist, is the result of the objectification of women in society as possessions to be won. (Malfeasance versus nonfeasance). Acquaintance rape sounds like the symptom of larger gender problems in society. (Woman being prized for their sexuality and modesty (contradiction,.. right? maybe not.) while Men are prized for their conquests.
Hmmmm... heres a thought... if you could index Countries attitudes toward Sex, or rather openness, would that have an indirect relationship with acquaintance rape? Just a thought for a future empirical study. Overall, I really enjoyed your paper... I didn't have any academic (or otherwise!) experience with the subject.
-- JosephMacias - 05 Apr 2008
I thought this was really interesting piece as well. I like the way you framed the issue and identified the problems. it does seem to be a problem in social/gender conditioning which education could address in part over time. The problems you and others identified with your solution are considerable and i would be interested to hear what other ideas people have to deal with the way this type of rape should be treated. i was wondering if you had more or any kind of information/statistics on acquaintance rape as in what percentage of reported rapes every year it comprises? also, im sort of curious as to how they come up with these estimations regarding the number of rapes that go unreported every year.
-- JonathanBoustani - 10 Apr 2008 | | |
\ No newline at end of file |
|
|
ClaireOSullivan-SecondPaper 10 - 10 Apr 2008 - Main.JonathanBoustani
|
| |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="WebPreferences" |
|---|
Final Version | | | -- JosephMacias - 05 Apr 2008
| |
>
> |
I thought this was really interesting piece as well. I like the way you framed the issue and identified the problems. it does seem to be a problem in social/gender conditioning which education could address in part over time. The problems you and others identified with your solution are considerable and i would be interested to hear what other ideas people have to deal with the way this type of rape should be treated. i was wondering if you had more or any kind of information/statistics on acquaintance rape as in what percentage of reported rapes every year it comprises? also, im sort of curious as to how they come up with these estimations regarding the number of rapes that go unreported every year.
-- JonathanBoustani - 10 Apr 2008 | | | |
|
|
ClaireOSullivan-SecondPaper 9 - 05 Apr 2008 - Main.JosephMacias
|
| |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="WebPreferences" |
|---|
Final Version | | | This is a really interesting piece. This may not be the point of your paper but I got left wondering what the gender stereotypes are which lead to acquaintance rape. I don't know if you have the space or the inclination to deal with that. It could be a whole other paper though. Very interesting to read. I wonder what the male perspective on this reform would be. Maybe it's Femi's reaction that one gender should not be penalized for the miscommunication. Should women undergo some sort of therapy so withdrawn consent does not reoccur? Just an idea.
-- JulianBaez - 04 Apr 2008 | |
>
> | Feminine timidity regarding sex isn't an inherent aspect of women that society should intervene and correct. This timidity, to the extent that it does exist, is the result of the objectification of women in society as possessions to be won. (Malfeasance versus nonfeasance). Acquaintance rape sounds like the symptom of larger gender problems in society. (Woman being prized for their sexuality and modesty (contradiction,.. right? maybe not.) while Men are prized for their conquests.
Hmmmm... heres a thought... if you could index Countries attitudes toward Sex, or rather openness, would that have an indirect relationship with acquaintance rape? Just a thought for a future empirical study. Overall, I really enjoyed your paper... I didn't have any academic (or otherwise!) experience with the subject.
-- JosephMacias - 05 Apr 2008
| | |
\ No newline at end of file |
|
|
ClaireOSullivan-SecondPaper 8 - 04 Apr 2008 - Main.JulianBaez
|
| |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="WebPreferences" |
|---|
Final Version | | | Thanks everyone for your feedback. I do see why it is unsatisfying to identify a one-sided solution for a problem that I've framed as two-sided. I've tried to address this in my final version; however it also seems to me that, since the problem still comes down to unwanted sexual contact being imposed on the victim, it makes more sense to put the onus on the aggressor to change their behaviour and mindset. Holding women responsible for re-framing their lack of consent (say, by fighting back physically) to make sure that the man will understand seems dangerous to me. Anyway I find this to be a very difficult issue (which was why I wanted to spend some time thinking about it by writing this paper) and I appreciate everyone's input.
-- ClaireOSullivan - 04 Apr 2008 | |
>
> |
This is a really interesting piece. This may not be the point of your paper but I got left wondering what the gender stereotypes are which lead to acquaintance rape. I don't know if you have the space or the inclination to deal with that. It could be a whole other paper though. Very interesting to read. I wonder what the male perspective on this reform would be. Maybe it's Femi's reaction that one gender should not be penalized for the miscommunication. Should women undergo some sort of therapy so withdrawn consent does not reoccur? Just an idea.
-- JulianBaez - 04 Apr 2008 | | | |
|
|
ClaireOSullivan-SecondPaper 7 - 04 Apr 2008 - Main.ClaireOSullivan
|
| |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="WebPreferences" |
|---|
| |
<
< | Outline
Thesis: Rape is a problem that our justice system is not well equipped to address, and the law is over- and under-inclusive as a result. An intermediate misdemeanour charge, which entailed education and therapy instead of jail time, would be a better method than either full acquittal or a full rape conviction for dealing with acquaintance rapes where physical force was absent and which are based on a mistaken belief of consent. | >
> | Final Version | | | | |
>
> | Introduction
Rape presents a particular problem for our justice system. The subjective elements of the crime, the frequent lack of evidence outside the testimony of the parties involved, and the stereotypes and stigma that surround it all make it and especially difficult issue. Clearly these issues arise in some degree in the adjudication of all crimes, but rape generally exaggerates all these problems, particularly in cases of acquaintance rape where evidence of significant physical force is lacking. An intermediate misdemeanour charge, which entailed education and sensitivity training instead of jail time, would be a better method than either full acquittal or a full rape conviction for dealing with acquaintance rapes that are based on a mistaken belief of consent. | | | Rape and the Law | |
>
> | Rape is Endemic and Under-Reported
Rape laws differ widely. In some states, there must have been physical force or the threat of physical force for a rape charge. Other jurisdictions hold that a lack of consent warrants a rape charge, whether or not there was physical force employed. In Canada, the victim's statement that she did not give consent is sufficient to shift the burden to the offender to prove otherwise. My contention that there is a particular problem with rape and the law is based on the disparity between the estimated number of rapes committed and the number that are reported. Clearly accurate numbers are impossible to get on this issue, but it is generally accepted that a significant percentage of rapes go unreported. The reasons for this are shame and guilt over the incident, as well as the perception that reporting the rape will be taxing and useless. | | | | |
<
< | What is the problem with rape and the law?
Note: all states have different statutes, there have been many positive developments in rape law in recent decades, I am here only dealing a specific issue: male-female non-forcible acquaintance rape. Some states don’t even recognize non-forcible rape. Some countries take the woman’s statement that she didn’t give consent as sufficient to shift the burden to the defendant to prove otherwise (Canada).
However, pretty much everyone agrees that rape is still endemic to our society and is also chronically under-reported
Cases that are adjudicated almost always hinge on he-said, she-said and so are going to be over and under inclusive
The disparity between rapes committed and rapes reported indicates that the law needs to do a better job of addressing rape
Why does the law do a bad job of dealing with rape?
Rape is different than other crimes in that there is rarely evidence outside of the testimony of the victim and defendant
Rape is complicated by gender stereotypes and traditional beliefs about sex roles
There is therefore a subjective element to rape that makes it especially ill-suited to be dealt with by a justice system that attempts to establish the objective truth by examining evidence (there is generally none) and deciding on credibility (both parties could be credible bc both could be telling what they perceive as the truth of what happened)
Stuck with either trying to make the law normative (can talk about cannibalism article here) and punishing people for crimes they did not realize they were committing, or acquitting and thereby tacitly endorsing non-forcible acquaintance rape | >
> | The Criminal Justice System Deals Poorly with Rape
My particular interest here is in male-female acquaintance rapes, which are much more difficult to deal with than stranger rape. In these cases, there is rarely any evidence outside the testimony of the two parties, since any evidence of rape will generally also be consistent with consensual sexual activity. This makes it easy for both parties to tell extremely divergent stories of the incident. However, an even more difficult hurdle is that the man and woman involved may have genuinely different impressions of what happened. There is therefore a subjective element to this type of rape that makes it especially ill-suited to be dealt with by a justice system that attempts to establish the objective truth by examining evidence and deciding on credibility. The jury has to pick which of the narratives to believe, both of which may be subjectively true, with the following result: either men who do not believe they did anything wrong are convicted of rape, or the claims of women who did not consent to sexual activity are dismissed. | | | A Possible Alternative | | | A Possible Alternative | |
<
< | | | | Gender stereotypes are the underlying problem | |
>
> | Traditional ideas about sex roles and the socialization of the two genders are at the heart of acquaintance rape. First there is the idea (held by both men and women) that women are supposed to display initial resistance to sexual contact, and men are supposed to act aggressively in response to this. This can result in a woman’s resistance being taken for coyness. Then there is the idea that if a woman is not consenting, she should attempt to fight off the offender physically. Firstly, men tend to be larger and stronger than women, who may as a result perceive fighting back physically to be useless. Secondly, this concept is based in a very male idea of conflict behaviour: women (for any number of biological or social reasons) are less likely than men to respond in kind to physical aggression; they are more likely to try to avoid escalating the situation. These factors add up to a situation where a man can fail to perceive a woman’s lack of consent, despite her belief that she is making it clear. | | | | |
<
< | Acquaintance rape is at its heart an issue of traditional ideas about sex roles and gender stereotypes (women always show initial resistance, men are supposed to be aggressive)
If there is a genuine mistake about consent, it is unjust to punish the rapist. This can happen under a law like Canada’s, which says that if the victim was incapable of giving consent or made any indication of lack of consent, mistaken consent cannot be used as a defence. However, it is also unsatisfactory to acquit the rapist bc he obviously engaged in sexual conduct that was unwelcome. So the law can be both over and under inclusive
It follows that the way to deal with this is to work towards eradicating the societal ideas that lead to acquaintance rape
Mandatory Education and/or Therapy to Combat the Problem
An intermediate charge that could be used in non-forcible acquaintance rapes might provide a viable alternative. A conviction under that charge would ideally entail therapy sessions and sensitivity training for the defendant. The training would focus on eradicating the traditional ideas that lead to acquaintance rape based on miscommunication. Ideally this would impress on the offender the seriousness of what occurred, and prevent a recurrence, without the stigma and severe punishment of a rape conviction. The victim would also be vindicated in some sense because the court is recognizing that what the offender did was wrong.
Obv there are potential problems (might put real rapists back on the street, high costs of therapy, etc). The most serious risk is that this could be abused by juries to “excuse” date rape. It would have to be made clear that there is a high standard – the charge can only be made where there is convincing evidence that the perpetrator had a genuine, objectively reasonable, good faith belief that the victim had consented. | >
> | Mandatory Education to Combat the Problem
If there is a genuine mistake about consent, it is unjust to punish the rapist. This can happen under a law like Canada’s, which says that if the victim was incapable of giving consent or made any indication of lack of consent, mistake regarding consent cannot be used as a defence. However, it is also unsatisfactory to acquit the rapist, because he obviously engaged in sexual conduct that was unwelcome. Since gender-based miscommunication is the source of this problem, the logical way forward is to work towards eradicating the ideas and misconceptions that underlie it. An intermediate charge that could be used in non-forcible acquaintance rapes might provide a viable alternative. A conviction under that charge would ideally entail education and sensitivity training for the defendant. The training would focus on eradicating the traditional ideas that lead to acquaintance rape based on miscommunication. Ideally this would impress on the offender the seriousness of what occurred, and prevent a recurrence, without the stigma and severe punishment of a rape conviction. The victim would also be vindicated in some sense because the court is recognizing that what the offender did was wrong.
There are a lot of potential problems with this idea. Training and education are expensive, and may meet with resistance from students who do not perceive it as necessary. The most serious risk is that juries could abuse it to excuse acquaintance rape; offenders who ignored a lack of consent in bad faith might escape punishment. It would have to be made clear that there is a high standard – the charge can only be made where there is convincing evidence that the perpetrator had a genuine, objectively reasonable, good faith belief that the victim had consented, and there is no evidence of physical force. | | | Conclusion | |
<
< | Despite the potential problems, a misdemeanour conviction that requires therapy and sensitivity training is preferable to a rape conviction or an acquittal in cases where the jury perceives that there has been a genuine mistake regarding consent. | >
> | Despite these problems, I think this idea could help combat both the occurrence of acquaintance rape and the failure to report it, by providing education for offenders and deterrence for others, as well as making full acquittals in cases of date rape less likely. It could also limit the number of men who are convicted of rape unjustly. Finally, it could help to counter the shame and guilt that is associated with victims of acquaintance rape by assuring women that, even in cases where the offender is an acquaintance and physical violence was largely absent, their lack of consent will be respected by the law. | | | -- ClaireOSullivan - 31 Mar 2008
| | | I don't know. I like the analysis. I just don't know how well tailored to the problem the solution really is.
-- OluwafemiMorohunfola - 04 Apr 2008 | |
>
> |
Thanks everyone for your feedback. I do see why it is unsatisfying to identify a one-sided solution for a problem that I've framed as two-sided. I've tried to address this in my final version; however it also seems to me that, since the problem still comes down to unwanted sexual contact being imposed on the victim, it makes more sense to put the onus on the aggressor to change their behaviour and mindset. Holding women responsible for re-framing their lack of consent (say, by fighting back physically) to make sure that the man will understand seems dangerous to me. Anyway I find this to be a very difficult issue (which was why I wanted to spend some time thinking about it by writing this paper) and I appreciate everyone's input.
-- ClaireOSullivan - 04 Apr 2008 | | |
\ No newline at end of file |
|
|
ClaireOSullivan-SecondPaper 6 - 04 Apr 2008 - Main.OluwafemiMorohunfola
|
| |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="WebPreferences" |
|---|
Outline | | | As Claire said, the subjective element of sexual conduct/relations makes it difficult to address through traditional legal avenues. Perhaps we could use the law--through potential punishment/sanctions--to encourage individuals to police their own sexual behavior? Since a misdemeanor charge would possibly be easier to charge and convict on, individuals may be more likely to make sure that they aren’t engaging in date rape. Claire, I’m excited to see how this idea pans out.
-- MinaNasseri - 01 Apr 2008 | |
>
> |
Claire, i think that this is an excellent idea, and, as i mentioned to you before, it is very close to how i was originally going to frame my topic. I've since broadened my topic so as to create less overlap. But, i'm thinking i'll link your topic to mine, because it's a good example of the analysis that i think should occur more often wherever there are gender biases in the law. You get at the heart of the problem, and think outside of the box to create a solution. All in all, very good idead.
Unfortunately, and it is with great dismay that i say this, i have to at least partially agree with gradman. If you concede that the root of the problem is in socialized gender miscommunications which play a role in how both genders communicate in the bedroom, i hardly see it as fair to penalize one gender for a mistake both contribute to. I'm not sure i see any better way to do it (maybe better sex ed in HS dealing with issues like this), but it seems like blaming the individual for a mistake created by the group, if not society as a whole.
I don't know. I like the analysis. I just don't know how well tailored to the problem the solution really is.
-- OluwafemiMorohunfola - 04 Apr 2008 | | |
\ No newline at end of file |
|
|
ClaireOSullivan-SecondPaper 4 - 01 Apr 2008 - Main.MinaNasseri
|
| |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="WebPreferences" |
|---|
Outline | | | Claire isn't advocating the creation of a tort. I think she's trying to find a middle ground within criminal law between the approach of Canada, which may over-criminalize such 'misunderstandings', and the approach of jurisdictions which refuse to recognize non-forcible rape at all. This doesn't preclude preemptive education, but we get plenty of that in high school and college and it's barely taken seriously, i think precisely because non-forcible rape is often chalked up to a simple misunderstanding. However, to call non-forcible rape a misunderstanding is oversimplified because in many instances the perpetrator may understand perfectly well the signals being given, but may know that that he (or she?) can pretty much get away with it. I have no idea how criminal law should deal with that problem. I think this will be a good topic to grapple with.
-- VishalA? - 01 Apr 2008 | |
>
> |
Andrew, I think that having an intermediate misdemeanor charge such as the one Claire suggests may serve as a deterrent or a self-policing mechanism (a preemptive strike, as you put it). Knowing that they may face such a charge, individuals about to engage in sexual conduct will be urged to ask themselves: “Am I absolutely sure that there is consent here?” If one party is drunk, or in some other way incapacitated, there will be incentive to refrain from sexual conduct.
As Claire said, the subjective element of sexual conduct/relations makes it difficult to address through traditional legal avenues. Perhaps we could use the law--through potential punishment/sanctions--to encourage individuals to police their own sexual behavior? Since a misdemeanor charge would possibly be easier to charge and convict on, individuals may be more likely to make sure that they aren’t engaging in date rape. Claire, I’m excited to see how this idea pans out.
-- MinaNasseri - 01 Apr 2008 | | | |
|
|
ClaireOSullivan-SecondPaper 3 - 01 Apr 2008 - Main.VishalA
|
| |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="WebPreferences" |
|---|
Outline | | | | |
>
> |
Claire isn't advocating the creation of a tort. I think she's trying to find a middle ground within criminal law between the approach of Canada, which may over-criminalize such 'misunderstandings', and the approach of jurisdictions which refuse to recognize non-forcible rape at all. This doesn't preclude preemptive education, but we get plenty of that in high school and college and it's barely taken seriously, i think precisely because non-forcible rape is often chalked up to a simple misunderstanding. However, to call non-forcible rape a misunderstanding is oversimplified because in many instances the perpetrator may understand perfectly well the signals being given, but may know that that he (or she?) can pretty much get away with it. I have no idea how criminal law should deal with that problem. I think this will be a good topic to grapple with.
-- VishalA? - 01 Apr 2008 | | | |
|
|
ClaireOSullivan-SecondPaper 2 - 31 Mar 2008 - Main.AndrewGradman
|
| |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="WebPreferences" |
|---|
| |
<
< | -- ClaireOSullivan - 31 Mar 2008
| | | Outline | | | Conclusion
Despite the potential problems, a misdemeanour conviction that requires therapy and sensitivity training is preferable to a rape conviction or an acquittal in cases where the jury perceives that there has been a genuine mistake regarding consent. | |
>
> | -- ClaireOSullivan - 31 Mar 2008
I do agree with your thesis: "Rape is a problem that our justice system is not well equipped to address." And I would like to suggest some names for the tort you propose: "Moving too fast;" "Disrespecting an acquaintance;" "Violating Title VII with a potential co-worker;" "Stealing bases."
I don't mean to disrespect the real problem: social intercourses get interpreted differently by their participants. But the fact that intercourses (sexual or otherwise) contain misunderstandings does not, by itself, justify the erection of state power and its thrusting upon one party the other's understanding. "Misunderstanding" should not be made a tort.
I think that education and therapy are more properly applied preemptively, as they currently are. Assuming that our goal is to reduce the number of relationships that end in accusations of rape, we should help EVERYONE, men and women alike, learn to send and read signals better.
-- AndrewGradman - 31 Mar 2008
|
|
|
ClaireOSullivan-SecondPaper 1 - 31 Mar 2008 - Main.ClaireOSullivan
|
|
>
> |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="WebPreferences" |
|---|
-- ClaireOSullivan - 31 Mar 2008
Outline
Thesis: Rape is a problem that our justice system is not well equipped to address, and the law is over- and under-inclusive as a result. An intermediate misdemeanour charge, which entailed education and therapy instead of jail time, would be a better method than either full acquittal or a full rape conviction for dealing with acquaintance rapes where physical force was absent and which are based on a mistaken belief of consent.
Rape and the Law
What is the problem with rape and the law?
Note: all states have different statutes, there have been many positive developments in rape law in recent decades, I am here only dealing a specific issue: male-female non-forcible acquaintance rape. Some states don’t even recognize non-forcible rape. Some countries take the woman’s statement that she didn’t give consent as sufficient to shift the burden to the defendant to prove otherwise (Canada).
However, pretty much everyone agrees that rape is still endemic to our society and is also chronically under-reported
Cases that are adjudicated almost always hinge on he-said, she-said and so are going to be over and under inclusive
The disparity between rapes committed and rapes reported indicates that the law needs to do a better job of addressing rape
Why does the law do a bad job of dealing with rape?
Rape is different than other crimes in that there is rarely evidence outside of the testimony of the victim and defendant
Rape is complicated by gender stereotypes and traditional beliefs about sex roles
There is therefore a subjective element to rape that makes it especially ill-suited to be dealt with by a justice system that attempts to establish the objective truth by examining evidence (there is generally none) and deciding on credibility (both parties could be credible bc both could be telling what they perceive as the truth of what happened)
Stuck with either trying to make the law normative (can talk about cannibalism article here) and punishing people for crimes they did not realize they were committing, or acquitting and thereby tacitly endorsing non-forcible acquaintance rape
A Possible Alternative
Gender stereotypes are the underlying problem
Acquaintance rape is at its heart an issue of traditional ideas about sex roles and gender stereotypes (women always show initial resistance, men are supposed to be aggressive)
If there is a genuine mistake about consent, it is unjust to punish the rapist. This can happen under a law like Canada’s, which says that if the victim was incapable of giving consent or made any indication of lack of consent, mistaken consent cannot be used as a defence. However, it is also unsatisfactory to acquit the rapist bc he obviously engaged in sexual conduct that was unwelcome. So the law can be both over and under inclusive
It follows that the way to deal with this is to work towards eradicating the societal ideas that lead to acquaintance rape
Mandatory Education and/or Therapy to Combat the Problem
An intermediate charge that could be used in non-forcible acquaintance rapes might provide a viable alternative. A conviction under that charge would ideally entail therapy sessions and sensitivity training for the defendant. The training would focus on eradicating the traditional ideas that lead to acquaintance rape based on miscommunication. Ideally this would impress on the offender the seriousness of what occurred, and prevent a recurrence, without the stigma and severe punishment of a rape conviction. The victim would also be vindicated in some sense because the court is recognizing that what the offender did was wrong.
Obv there are potential problems (might put real rapists back on the street, high costs of therapy, etc). The most serious risk is that this could be abused by juries to “excuse” date rape. It would have to be made clear that there is a high standard – the charge can only be made where there is convincing evidence that the perpetrator had a genuine, objectively reasonable, good faith belief that the victim had consented.
Conclusion
Despite the potential problems, a misdemeanour conviction that requires therapy and sensitivity training is preferable to a rape conviction or an acquittal in cases where the jury perceives that there has been a genuine mistake regarding consent. |
|
|
|
|
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
|
|