Law in Contemporary Society

View   r11  >  r10  ...
DRussellKraftFirstPaper 11 - 02 Mar 2010 - Main.DRussellKraft
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="FirstPaper"

Just Punishment?

Line: 89 to 89
 

 
<--/commentPlugin-->
Added:
>
>
 
  • I wonder if there might also be a broader cultural point to make about theological justification? -- GloverWright - 02 Mar 2010
  • Your paragraph on retributivism seems to suggest it makes our punishments harsher. From my, admittedly cynical, viewpoint - it's really a limiting factor. From what I've read, Lex Talionis and its variations were a way to say 'You can't kill for this, you can only inflict so much harm.' When we used to kill, now we only jail. It does give moral justification for the harm, but it also attempts to reign in our baser instinct to just kill anyone who fucks with us. Maybe that's your point too, but the paragraph seems to be riding the middle. -- StephenSevero - 28 Feb 2010
    • Stephen - What I'm trying to say is exactly what you suggest: Retributivism certainly has a built-in limiter in the requirement for guilt. To address your criticism, I'm not sure how to get that point as well as the Retributivism's justification of the infliction of suffering by outsiders without some amount of "riding the middle." Do you have suggestions on how I could make it more clear? Cheers. -- DRussellKraft - 28 Feb 2010

Revision 11r11 - 02 Mar 2010 - 04:38:58 - DRussellKraft
Revision 10r10 - 02 Mar 2010 - 04:34:06 - GloverWright
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM