Law in Contemporary Society

View   r4  >  r3  ...
KalliopeKefallinosFirstPaper 4 - 21 Mar 2010 - Main.KalliopeKefallinos
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="FirstPaper"
Changed:
<
<
>
>
 
Line: 35 to 35
  If he chooses to turn Stack away, could he live with himself as he watches the consequences of his inaction unfold? After all, even the “baddest” of men would cringe watching Stack crash into the IRS building.

 
<--/commentPlugin-->
Added:
>
>
  • I think knowing my original idea will help the feedback process, so here's what I was trying to tackle: When a lawyer has something he wants to accomplish, but he sees that this something goes against established norms within the legal system such that it will be very difficult (if not impossible?) in practice to accomplish, what are his options? Should he try to change the system, or are the norms so pervasive he should better focus on overturning it? But that sounds a bit extreme. Should he create new organizations? Where would he get the money? In class, I think Eben gave one answer: become an expert on something such that those who control the current system will need your expertise in the future. This would help secure the funding aspect. The lawyer chips away at the source of the power. -- KalliopeKefallinos - 21 Mar 2010
 


Revision 4r4 - 21 Mar 2010 - 18:27:01 - KalliopeKefallinos
Revision 3r3 - 03 Mar 2010 - 03:53:37 - KalliopeKefallinos
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM