Law in Contemporary Society

View   r3  >  r2  ...
KeithEdelmanFirstPaper 3 - 26 Mar 2009 - Main.IanSullivan
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="FirstPaper"
Line: 52 to 52
 

Conclusion

Our criminal justice system should maximize social improvement and minimize deprivation of liberty. Rehabilitation, which does not require imprisonment, is the ultimate goal. If this is not possible, prison is the last resort; such limited confinement is properly supported by a moral and utilitarian necessity to incapacitate. As such, our criminal justice system should afford every individual a right to full rehabilitative efforts. Only the few incapable of positive change “belong” in prison. To do otherwise would harm us all.

Added:
>
>

  • This is all very well, but there isn't the slightest chance on earth of its happening. The reasons are many; the enterprise of imprisoning a significant fraction of the young men at the bottom of our social structure has created incumbent beneficiaries through the "prison-industrial complex," and the attitude of the electorate is not going to grow less prison-minded as economic conditions grow harsher and crime rates rise.

  • Given that you know the medium-term likelihood of the only sensible reform is zero, what comes next? That's really where you need to take the revision.
 \ No newline at end of file

Revision 3r3 - 26 Mar 2009 - 22:25:54 - IanSullivan
Revision 2r2 - 27 Feb 2009 - 23:00:16 - KeithEdelman
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM