Law in Contemporary Society

View   r12  >  r11  ...
KippMuellerFirstPaper 12 - 07 Jul 2012 - Main.KippMueller
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="FirstPaper"

John Brown 2012

Line: 66 to 66
 What I'm trying to find, and constantly coming short of finding, is where enough is enough. How do you draw that line? And if you come short of depriving yourself of all luxuries, knowing that the purchases you're making could feed or vaccinate or educate, how do you justify it?
Changed:
<
<		I didn't want to go down the path that conservatives would likely take, just because it's very uninteresting to me: You earned it, it's your money, blah blah. That's premised of course on the revolting idea that we live in a Me vs. You world rather than Me and You world.
>
>		I didn't want to go down the path that some conservatives would likely take, just because it's very uninteresting to me: You earned it, it's your money, blah blah. That's premised of course on the revolting idea that we live in a Me vs. You world rather than Me and You world.
 Assuming arguendo that you (whoever you are reading this) and I share a "Me and You" worldview, how does one choose battles without complete self-sacrifice? And how is it justifiable when I refuse to fight a battle that I know is an injustice?

Revision 12r12 - 07 Jul 2012 - 01:45:32 - KippMueller
Revision 11r11 - 06 Jul 2012 - 17:17:16 - KippMueller
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM