|
LeslieHannayFirstPaper 2 - 01 Mar 2009 - Main.LeslieHannay
|
| |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="FirstPaper" |
|---|
| | |
A Case Study in Hope: Climate Change | |
<
< | Over the past decade, science has reached a broad consensus as to the seriousness of anthropogenic climate change. The connections between human activity and changes in our atmosphere, and their potentially calamitous effects on the natural world and human societies, have been somewhat slower to appear in our national dialogue. This is due in no small part to the persistent and vociferous campaigns in the media, the Bush Administration, and other organs of propaganda for the interests of business as usual. This is, of course, not a new role for the news media, which has a stake in maintaining a healthy buffer between reality and its popular apprehension. Whether this is the result of the healthy functioning of media corporations operating in a competitive market, or a more self-conscious effort by the media monopoly to relegate unsympathetic science to the fringe so as to encourage business as usual is of course debatable. | >
> | Over the past decade, science has reached a broad consensus as to the seriousness of anthropogenic climate change. The connections between human activity and changes in our atmosphere, and their potentially calamitous effects on the natural world and human societies, have been somewhat slower to appear in our national dialogue. This is due in no small part to the persistent and vociferous campaigns in the media, the Bush Administration, and other organs of propaganda for the interests of business as usual. This is, of course, not a new role for the news media, which has a stake in maintaining a healthy buffer between reality and its popular apprehension. Whether this is the result of the healthy functioning of media corporations operating in a competitive market, or a more self-conscious effort by the media monopoly to relegate unsympathetic science to the fringe so as to encourage business as usual is of course debatable. | | | This denial was greatly aided by a popular resistance to embracing the implications and form of such large-scale ecological harm. This lackluster global catastrophe offends the aesthetics of our expectant viewing audience, which has been primed to recognize the End of Days as a cataclysmic tumult of wind, hellfire and catastrophic floods. (Unfortunately, these expectations may not be disappointed.) |
|
|
LeslieHannayFirstPaper 1 - 27 Feb 2009 - Main.LeslieHannay
|
|
>
> |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="FirstPaper" |
|---|
A Wrench in the System
-- By LeslieHannay - 27 Feb 2009
Society is like a stew. If you don't stir it up every once in a while then a layer of scum floats to the top.
-Edward Abbey
What's Going On
There has been much hand-wringing (and not a little finger-pointing) of late over the nasty turn of events in our global financial markets. Business is not good: hard times lay ahead. While I recognize that I am no less bound to the fate of these sliding fortunes than the next debt-saddled American, I cannot deny that I feel, for the first time in a long while, a glimmer of hope that we might somehow use this opportunity to reform our abusive relationship with the planet. Capitalism itself, it would seem, has provided the monkey wrench for us.
A Case Study in Hope: Climate Change
Over the past decade, science has reached a broad consensus as to the seriousness of anthropogenic climate change. The connections between human activity and changes in our atmosphere, and their potentially calamitous effects on the natural world and human societies, have been somewhat slower to appear in our national dialogue. This is due in no small part to the persistent and vociferous campaigns in the media, the Bush Administration, and other organs of propaganda for the interests of business as usual. This is, of course, not a new role for the news media, which has a stake in maintaining a healthy buffer between reality and its popular apprehension. Whether this is the result of the healthy functioning of media corporations operating in a competitive market, or a more self-conscious effort by the media monopoly to relegate unsympathetic science to the fringe so as to encourage business as usual is of course debatable.
This denial was greatly aided by a popular resistance to embracing the implications and form of such large-scale ecological harm. This lackluster global catastrophe offends the aesthetics of our expectant viewing audience, which has been primed to recognize the End of Days as a cataclysmic tumult of wind, hellfire and catastrophic floods. (Unfortunately, these expectations may not be disappointed.)
Climate Change: a Preview
Admittedly, the problem of fully understanding what is at stake when we’re talking about climate change is a natural result of the complexity of its contributing factors and the catastrophic consequences that are projected from deceptively small changes in temperature. A recent report by the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change projects with over 90% certainty that most of the warming observed over the past 50 years is caused by man-made greenhouse gas emissions. The projected changes in weather that will result include melting of sea ice, sea level rise and higher temperatures, greater frequency of extreme temperature and weather events, and higher incidence of drought. Other reports also show that these processes are progressing at a much more rapid rate than initially predicted. [View short film].
The immediate effects of climate change are already being seen, and have far-reaching implications for the availability of food and water worldwide, and, especially in the warmer, most populous developing regions. Rising temperatures will diminish the viability of some of the world’s currently most productive agricultural regions. India will lose up to 1/3 of its agricultural capacity by 2050, while more arid countries such as Chad will be unable to support agriculture at all. Rising tensions over scarce resources will be accompanied by an increase in conflict. Indeed, conflict related to economic scarcity is already being seen across the developed and developing world.
Why I am Hopeful
Nothing seems clearer than that the attitudes of any given ruling class are so set that all the argument in the world will not change them.
As in Arnold’s description of resistance to adopting practical solutions to the waste of precious soil and other resources, the process of enacting workable solutions to address modern environmental issues has been at an impasse for years. At least for the present moment, the fear of total financial collapse has muted the entrenched partisanship and reflexive rejection of anything with the flavor of socialism that has hindered progress on environmental issues. Because of this, President Obama has been able to put forward an energy plan that will have potentially significant effects on global warming, and will be (if it makes it through Congress) a strong step in the direction toward dealing with the problem in a way that will actually make a difference.
Will It Be Enough?
Unfortunately, the executive plan on its own will not be enough. The proposed solution does not reach the root causes of our global predicament: it’s just an effort to save the sinking ship. The talisman that we have waved around to fend off the demons of doubt is that capitalism, if left alone, will right itself, because self-interested rational agents will not choose to self-destruct. (That these so-called rational agents are most often corporations is not deemed relevant. Yet what is the corporation if not “an externalizing machine - moving its operating costs to external organizations and people”). This blind faith in the system ignores the evidence that our addled consumer society, broken education system, soaring global poverty, cities of garbage, and now crumbling financial systems present. The system works as a way to convert resources on a large scale. We, as a society, cannot rely on this same system to ameliorate the problems that it has created.
Dénouement: Business As Usual?
Once the economic system is set aright (assuming that it can be saved), the system’s gears will recommence their grinding out the “great blaze of heaven into animal shapes and kitchen tools,” the window of opportunity will close, and the system will not change.
If our religion continues to be the religion of buying and selling, it doesn’t matter whether we use clean energy or low-grade coal to produce our iPods and designer shoes. Without a corresponding revolution in our way of thinking about what it is, exactly, that we’re supposed to be doing here, our cheap fixes will merely serve to forestall the inevitable, ultimate collapse of the natural world, and the society that it supports.
# * Set ALLOWTOPICVIEW = TWikiAdminGroup, LeslieHannay
Note: TWiki has strict formatting rules. Make sure you preserve the three spaces, asterisk, and extra space at the beginning of that line. If you wish to give access to any other users simply add them to the comma separated list |
|
|
|
|
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
|
|