Law in Contemporary Society

View   r11  >  r10  ...
MohitGourisariaFirstPaper 11 - 30 Mar 2010 - Main.MohitGourisaria
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="FirstPaper"
Line: 69 to 69
 – Dhammapada (Verse 62)
Changed:
<
<		[I would like to sum Nona's and Devin's comments, which helped me as I edited the piece to increase clarity. Both were concerned with the meaning of the term "empty" and how we can utilise our understanding of it in practical terms. Nona expressed confusion over whether the "Dharma metaphor [should be applied] to a SCOTUS decision" and how the notion of fading away should be understood. Devin wanted some Buddhist a more detailed explanation of Buddhist philosophy but I found this difficult to achieve within our word limit -- briefing a concept would be a misstatement on my part.]
>
>		[I would like to sum Nona's and Devin's comments, which helped me as I edited the piece to increase clarity. Both were concerned with the meaning of the term "empty" and how we can utilise our understanding of it in practical terms. Nona expressed confusion over whether the "Dharma metaphor [should be applied] to a SCOTUS decision" and how the notion of fading away should be understood. Devin wanted a more detailed explanation of Buddhist philosophy but I found this difficult to achieve within our word limit -- briefing a concept would be misstatement on my part.]
 

Revision 11r11 - 30 Mar 2010 - 00:39:15 - MohitGourisaria
Revision 10r10 - 26 Feb 2010 - 20:47:58 - MohitGourisaria
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM