Law in the Internet Society

View   r11  >  r10  ...
DanielHarrisPaper1 11 - 19 Dec 2008 - Main.DanielHarris
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebHome"
Open for comments and edits.
Line: 64 to 64
 Also, on a case by case basis, all you need are a few complaints against printers (if the judge who receives the complaint sanctions the attorney on that particular case) and the quality of the representation of the RIAA will go way down. No one wants to be fined, censured and made unpopular amongst the printing and copying machinery community.

-- HamiltonFalk - 17 Dec 2008

Added:
>
>

Tony -- the pro-consumer view on making available might be sufficient: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122966038836021137.html?mod=rss_whats_news_technology

Unfortunately, there is still substantial disagreement on the point and no appellate ruling. I'm not sure if this is a formal rule of law, but when you manage to fool a handful of district court judges you're probably out of Rule 11 territory.

Andrei -- as much as I'd like to lower it to $1, the content industry and its allies in legislatures would have a point in calling that an efficient breach too far. On the other hand, the new RIAA strategy (if it's to be believed) effectively gives up all statutory damages in favor of a privately administered pseudo-injunctive scheme.

-- DanielHarris - 19 Dec 2008

 
 
<--/commentPlugin-->

Revision 11r11 - 19 Dec 2008 - 14:24:48 - DanielHarris
Revision 10r10 - 17 Dec 2008 - 23:24:21 - HamiltonFalk
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM