|
DevinMcDougallSecondPaper 6 - 28 Nov 2011 - Main.DevinMcDougall
|
| |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="WebPreferences" |
|---|
| |
>
> | [READY FOR REVIEW] | | | Networking Brains: Making Change Happen with Bits
I. Introduction | |
<
< | The "network of pipes and switches" metaphor we have used to understand the internet in this class is also useful for understanding how brains work. At a high level of abstraction, a network of pipes and switches is a system where there are two basic categories of things, things that receive, process, and transmit information ("switches"), and things that serves a conduits along which information can flow ("pipes"). | >
> | The "network of pipes and switches" metaphor we have used to understand the internet in this class is also useful for understanding how brains work. At a high level of abstraction, a network can be understood a system where there are two basic categories of things, things that receive, process, and transmit information ("switches"), and things that serves a conduits along which information can flow ("pipes"). | | | To apply a consilient approach, the network model is useful for thinking about brains on two levels, personal psychology and social sociology. | | | If the brain is a network, we might be puzzled by the activity of its "invisible switches," but we keep in mind that with systematic observation, we can understand something of how they work and try to improve system performance (however defined). | |
<
< | These knowable regularities might be thought of as emerging from the interaction of genes and experience (in the form of memories encoded in the brain). We might call that the source code of a person. Genes may be fixed (though their expression can be mediated by environmental factors), but memories can be added to or reinterpreted. If, in Larry Lessig's metaphor, software code is law, this psychological source code is also law. | >
> | These knowable regularities might be thought of as emerging from the interaction of genes and experience (in the form of memories encoded in the brain). We might call that the source code of a person. Genes may be fixed (though their expression can be mediated by environmental factors), but memories can be added to or reinterpreted. If, in Larry Lessig's metaphor, software code is law, this psychological source code is also law. | | | | |
<
< | II. Social Psychology | >
> | III. Social Psychology | | | | |
<
< | Moving up a level of analysis, the network metaphor is also generative of useful insights when applied to social psychology. One quality of a using a network metaphor to look out at the social world is that it highlights the critical importance of information flows. Musician Ian MacKaye, talking about his childhood in Washington D.C., which involved a significant amount of skateboarding, related once that skateboarding was an important phase of his life. It trained him to look at the world as a place full of opportunities to ride a skateboard off things, not just a venue for the conduct of ordinary life. This was, on later reflection, an education in the power of looking at the structures of the world differently than most and using them in a different way - hacking, in a sense. | >
> | Moving up a level of analysis, the network metaphor is also generative of useful insights when applied to social psychology. One quality of a using a network metaphor to look out at the social world is that it highlights the critical importance of information flows. Musician Ian MacKaye, talking about his childhood in Washington D.C., which involved a significant amount of skateboarding, related once that skateboarding was an important phase of his life. It trained him to look at the world as a place full of opportunities to ride a skateboard off things, not just a venue for the conduct of ordinary life. This was, on later reflection, an education in the power of looking at the structures of the world differently than most and using them in a different way - hacking, in a sense. | | | Similarly, a social grouping of brains is a lot of things at the same time, but if, using a network metaphor, we focus on how interlinked our brains are, we see a rich array opportunities for communication and social change. If, as I proposed above, we agree with Lessig that code is law, and we consider that the genes and memories that comprise our personal psychological network are our source code, well-tailored memes can change the source code of many individuals rapidly and produce new combinations and unanticipated results. We can see dynamic in the Arab Spring and Occupy Wall Street.
It's now a banality that the interlacing of a computer network into human networks means that memes can spread further faster than in previous technological eras. However, it's important to note that this phenomenon is not just a matter of faster communication, it's also a constitutive process. After A shares information with B, information is transmitted. They are also now A1 and B1. As an Egyptian activist noted of the Egyptian uprising, "Before this social-media revolution, everyone was very individual, very single, very isolated and oppressed in islands...But social media has created bridges, has created channels between individuals, between activists, between even ordinary men, to speak out, to know that there are other men who think like me. We can work together, we can make something together." If we have a theory of self in which psychological structures can change based on context (rather than a notion of fixed character or personality), we might be receptive to the idea that communication changes not just what we know, but who we are. Our "source code" is different, and so the "rules of the game" are now different. In a sense, the law is different. | |
<
< | If we are interested in social change, thinking about our brains and our societies using the network metaphor generates some interesting strategic ideas. There are new, different ways to create change using words now. As the New Yorker relates, the original proposal for Occupy Wall Street emerged from the network-based collaboration between a man who lives in Berkeley, CA and a man who lives on a farm outside Vancouver.
The "Takriz" group which helped coordinate the Tunisian revolution began life as an email listserv. Both are examples of people who were not physically copresent, but who collaborated in shaping bitstreams of information that so appealed to other human brains that it helped stir them to passionate action, with significant real world results. | >
> | If we are interested in social change, thinking about our brains and our societies using the network metaphor generates some interesting strategic ideas. There are new, different ways to create change using words now. As the New Yorker relates, the original proposal for Occupy Wall Street emerged from the network-based collaboration between a man who lives in Berkeley, CA and a man who lives on a farm outside Vancouver. "Occupy-identified" groups have since spread around the world. The "Takriz" group which helped coordinate the Tunisian revolution began life as an email listserv and spread memes using Facebook. Both are examples of people who were not physically copresent, but who collaborated in shaping bitstreams of information that so appealed to other human brains that it helped stir them to passionate action, with significant real world results. |
|
|
DevinMcDougallSecondPaper 5 - 26 Nov 2011 - Main.DevinMcDougall
|
| |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="WebPreferences" |
|---|
| |
<
< | Hack Our Brains and Connect to Other Brains: Making Change Happen with Bits | >
> | Networking Brains: Making Change Happen with Bits | | | | |
<
< | I. Intro | >
> | | | | | |
<
< | The "network of pipes and switches" metaphor we have used to understand the internet in this class is also useful for understanding how brains work. At a high level of abstraction, a network of pipes and switches is a system where there are two basic categories of things, things that receive, process, and transmit information ("switches"), and things that serves a conduits along which information can flow ("pipes"). | >
> | I. Introduction | | | | |
<
< | To apply a consilient approach, the network model is useful for thinking about brains on two levels, personal psychology and social sociology. | >
> | The "network of pipes and switches" metaphor we have used to understand the internet in this class is also useful for understanding how brains work. At a high level of abstraction, a network of pipes and switches is a system where there are two basic categories of things, things that receive, process, and transmit information ("switches"), and things that serves a conduits along which information can flow ("pipes"). | | | | |
<
< | II. Personal Psychology | >
> | To apply a consilient approach, the network model is useful for thinking about brains on two levels, personal psychology and social sociology. | | | | |
<
< | On the level of personal psychology, to use a two-category model to describe something as complex as the brain may seem at first to be a gross oversimplification. But theoretical models can be useful for reasons other than descriptive accuracy. In fact, parsimony, the quality of having as little detail as possible, is a positive virtue for a model. | >
> | II. Personal Psychology | | | | |
<
< | However, the primary benefit of this model is that it highlights the importance of multiple networked agencies within what we often understand as a unitary self. Our conscious mind, the stream of phenomena we experience, is at any moment, just one switch connected by pipes to many unconscious switches doing important receiving, processing, and transmitting work. | >
> | On the level of personal psychology, the primary benefit of the network metaphor is that it highlights the importance of multiple networked agencies within what we often understand as a unitary self. Our conscious mind, the stream of phenomena we experience, is at any moment, just one switch connected by pipes to many unconscious switches doing important receiving, processing, and transmitting work. | | | | |
<
< | Understanding that our subjective experience is shaped decisively by information-processing and transmitting units within us the operation of which we do not perceive helps us think in productive ways. We realize that our views are shaped by unconscious biases, and that our thinking can influenced by our context. We can try to take corrective measures. Realizing that we have only partial agency helps make the smartest, best use of that agency. | >
> | Understanding that our subjective experience is shaped decisively by information-processing and transmitting units within us the operation of which we do not perceive helps us think in productive ways. We realize that our views are shaped by unconscious biases, and that our thinking can influenced by our context. We can try to take corrective measures. Realizing that we have only partial agency helps make the best use of that agency. | | | Another beneficial valence of the network metaphor, which reinforces that sense of agency, is its presumption of regularity. Computer networks are incredibly complex, but we operate with the assumption that there are knowable regularities to computer networks. We can use knowledge of those regularities to engineer them. | |
<
< | Often in our culture the subconscious is depicted as an irrational "Wild West" (see Heart of Darkness, Apocalypse Now, etc). It contributes to a sense of empowerment and agency, however, if we can think of it as subject to knowable regularities. | >
> | Often in our culture the subconscious is depicted as an irrational "Heart of Darkness." It contributes to a sense of empowerment and agency, however, if we can think of it as subject to knowable regularities. | | | If the brain is a network, we might be puzzled by the activity of its "invisible switches," but we keep in mind that with systematic observation, we can understand something of how they work and try to improve system performance (however defined). | |
<
< | These knowable regularities might be thought of as emerging from the interaction of genes and experience (in the form of memories encoded in the brain). We might call that the source code of a person. If, in Larry Lessig's metaphor, software code does some of the work of law, this psychological source code also does some of the work of law. Genes may be fixed, but memories can be added to or reinterpreted, further reinforcing a sense of agency.
II. Social Psychology
Moving up a level of analysis, the network metaphor is also generative of useful insights when applied to social psychology. The principle of knowable regularities is also useful when thinking about social phenomena. This may seem trivial, but the concept of "social engineering" has received bad press in recent decades in the United States. However, optimizing a complex system is difficult, but not impossible.
More importantly, one quality of a using a network metaphor to look out at the social world is that it highlights the critical importance of information flows.
the role of information. what do we see when we look out at the social world?
mackaye quote.
Memes. tailored information clusters. can change the psychological source code of many people. arab spring: exchanging info changed people from feeling isolated. information is key. bridges social psychology and personal psychology.
=
Is a network of pipes and switches a useful metaphor for the brain? Is it useful to think of the brain as a switch connected to the Internet?
metaphro
law, politics, tech
tech: the biology
law: social norms (including, as a subset, "the law"?)
politics: free will
. mindfulness, attention, memory
network of networks
splitting
neural networks
hyperconnectivity, effects on the brain, politics
http://tech.slashdot.org/story/11/11/11/1459258/how-is-technology-changing-the-brain
. "History of the neural network analogy
Main article: Connectionism
In the brain, spontaneous order appears to arise out of decentralized networks of simple units (neurons)." | >
> | These knowable regularities might be thought of as emerging from the interaction of genes and experience (in the form of memories encoded in the brain). We might call that the source code of a person. Genes may be fixed (though their expression can be mediated by environmental factors), but memories can be added to or reinterpreted. If, in Larry Lessig's metaphor, software code is law, this psychological source code is also law. | | | | |
<
< | . "Connectionism is a set of approaches in the fields of artificial intelligence, cognitive psychology, cognitive science, neuroscience and philosophy of mind, that models mental or behavioral phenomena as the emergent processes of interconnected networks of simple units. There are many forms of connectionism, but the most common forms use neural network models." | >
> | II. Social Psychology | | | | |
<
< | "the neural network analogy" | >
> | Moving up a level of analysis, the network metaphor is also generative of useful insights when applied to social psychology. One quality of a using a network metaphor to look out at the social world is that it highlights the critical importance of information flows. Musician Ian MacKaye, talking about his childhood in Washington D.C., which involved a significant amount of skateboarding, related once that skateboarding was an important phase of his life. It trained him to look at the world as a place full of opportunities to ride a skateboard off things, not just a venue for the conduct of ordinary life. This was, on later reflection, an education in the power of looking at the structures of the world differently than most and using them in a different way - hacking, in a sense. | | | | |
>
> | Similarly, a social grouping of brains is a lot of things at the same time, but if, using a network metaphor, we focus on how interlinked our brains are, we see a rich array opportunities for communication and social change. If, as I proposed above, we agree with Lessig that code is law, and we consider that the genes and memories that comprise our personal psychological network are our source code, well-tailored memes can change the source code of many individuals rapidly and produce new combinations and unanticipated results. We can see dynamic in the Arab Spring and Occupy Wall Street. | | | | |
<
< | . does this metaphor for the brain have implications for our legal image of the internet? | >
> | It's now a banality that the interlacing of a computer network into human networks means that memes can spread further faster than in previous technological eras. However, it's important to note that this phenomenon is not just a matter of faster communication, it's also a constitutive process. After A shares information with B, information is transmitted. They are also now A1 and B1. As an Egyptian activist noted of the Egyptian uprising, "Before this social-media revolution, everyone was very individual, very single, very isolated and oppressed in islands...But social media has created bridges, has created channels between individuals, between activists, between even ordinary men, to speak out, to know that there are other men who think like me. We can work together, we can make something together." If we have a theory of self in which psychological structures can change based on context (rather than a notion of fixed character or personality), we might be receptive to the idea that communication changes not just what we know, but who we are. Our "source code" is different, and so the "rules of the game" are now different. In a sense, the law is different. | | | | |
<
< | network - social connection - solitary confinement - form of torture (in some countries, solitary confinement is) - why is that? psychology, understanding of psychological health, social nature of brain. laws re internet access, French strikes law | | | \ No newline at end of file | |
>
> | If we are interested in social change, thinking about our brains and our societies using the network metaphor generates some interesting strategic ideas. There are new, different ways to create change using words now. As the New Yorker relates, the original proposal for Occupy Wall Street emerged from the network-based collaboration between a man who lives in Berkeley, CA and a man who lives on a farm outside Vancouver.
The "Takriz" group which helped coordinate the Tunisian revolution began life as an email listserv. Both are examples of people who were not physically copresent, but who collaborated in shaping bitstreams of information that so appealed to other human brains that it helped stir them to passionate action, with significant real world results. |
|
|
DevinMcDougallSecondPaper 4 - 25 Nov 2011 - Main.DevinMcDougall
|
| |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="WebPreferences" |
|---|
| |
>
> | Hack Our Brains and Connect to Other Brains: Making Change Happen with Bits
I. Intro
The "network of pipes and switches" metaphor we have used to understand the internet in this class is also useful for understanding how brains work. At a high level of abstraction, a network of pipes and switches is a system where there are two basic categories of things, things that receive, process, and transmit information ("switches"), and things that serves a conduits along which information can flow ("pipes").
To apply a consilient approach, the network model is useful for thinking about brains on two levels, personal psychology and social sociology.
II. Personal Psychology
On the level of personal psychology, to use a two-category model to describe something as complex as the brain may seem at first to be a gross oversimplification. But theoretical models can be useful for reasons other than descriptive accuracy. In fact, parsimony, the quality of having as little detail as possible, is a positive virtue for a model.
However, the primary benefit of this model is that it highlights the importance of multiple networked agencies within what we often understand as a unitary self. Our conscious mind, the stream of phenomena we experience, is at any moment, just one switch connected by pipes to many unconscious switches doing important receiving, processing, and transmitting work.
Understanding that our subjective experience is shaped decisively by information-processing and transmitting units within us the operation of which we do not perceive helps us think in productive ways. We realize that our views are shaped by unconscious biases, and that our thinking can influenced by our context. We can try to take corrective measures. Realizing that we have only partial agency helps make the smartest, best use of that agency.
Another beneficial valence of the network metaphor, which reinforces that sense of agency, is its presumption of regularity. Computer networks are incredibly complex, but we operate with the assumption that there are knowable regularities to computer networks. We can use knowledge of those regularities to engineer them.
Often in our culture the subconscious is depicted as an irrational "Wild West" (see Heart of Darkness, Apocalypse Now, etc). It contributes to a sense of empowerment and agency, however, if we can think of it as subject to knowable regularities.
If the brain is a network, we might be puzzled by the activity of its "invisible switches," but we keep in mind that with systematic observation, we can understand something of how they work and try to improve system performance (however defined).
These knowable regularities might be thought of as emerging from the interaction of genes and experience (in the form of memories encoded in the brain). We might call that the source code of a person. If, in Larry Lessig's metaphor, software code does some of the work of law, this psychological source code also does some of the work of law. Genes may be fixed, but memories can be added to or reinterpreted, further reinforcing a sense of agency.
II. Social Psychology
Moving up a level of analysis, the network metaphor is also generative of useful insights when applied to social psychology. The principle of knowable regularities is also useful when thinking about social phenomena. This may seem trivial, but the concept of "social engineering" has received bad press in recent decades in the United States. However, optimizing a complex system is difficult, but not impossible.
More importantly, one quality of a using a network metaphor to look out at the social world is that it highlights the critical importance of information flows.
the role of information. what do we see when we look out at the social world?
mackaye quote.
Memes. tailored information clusters. can change the psychological source code of many people. arab spring: exchanging info changed people from feeling isolated. information is key. bridges social psychology and personal psychology.
= | | | Is a network of pipes and switches a useful metaphor for the brain? Is it useful to think of the brain as a switch connected to the Internet?
metaphro |
|
|
DevinMcDougallSecondPaper 3 - 12 Nov 2011 - Main.DevinMcDougall
|
| |
| META TOPICPARENT | name="WebPreferences" |
|---|
Is a network of pipes and switches a useful metaphor for the brain? Is it useful to think of the brain as a switch connected to the Internet? | | | tech: the biology | |
<
< | law: social norms | >
> | law: social norms (including, as a subset, "the law"?) | | | politics: free will | | | hyperconnectivity, effects on the brain, politics
http://tech.slashdot.org/story/11/11/11/1459258/how-is-technology-changing-the-brain | |
>
> | . "History of the neural network analogy
Main article: Connectionism
In the brain, spontaneous order appears to arise out of decentralized networks of simple units (neurons)."
. "Connectionism is a set of approaches in the fields of artificial intelligence, cognitive psychology, cognitive science, neuroscience and philosophy of mind, that models mental or behavioral phenomena as the emergent processes of interconnected networks of simple units. There are many forms of connectionism, but the most common forms use neural network models."
"the neural network analogy"
. does this metaphor for the brain have implications for our legal image of the internet?
network - social connection - solitary confinement - form of torture (in some countries, solitary confinement is) - why is that? psychology, understanding of psychological health, social nature of brain. laws re internet access, French strikes law |
|
|
|
|
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
|
|