Pretty much everyone can agree that the claims you make are plausible, and no one (including you, who have not a scrap of actual evidence to offer) can show that they are true.

That's fine, but the right question to ask about claims of that character is, so what?

I know that it is perfectly possible to live a well-informed and cultivated life without having anything to do with "social media." I know that inexpensive and widely-available technologies allow more people to live such lives than has ever been possible before in the world's history. I know that ignorance is now practically preventible everywhere in humanity. I also know that mass media of the Edisonian era possessed ma y of the same vulnerabilities to manipulation, and succumbed as often.

It seems to me the interesting question that follows from where the current draft leaves us, then, is: "What technologies of freedom do the current conditions require us to produce for people? How can we make those particular technologies of freedom out of and by adapting the ones we already possess?"

MaxEFirstEssay

-- By MaxE - 13 Oct 2023

I. Intro

State and non-state actors manipulate social media platforms and their users to saturate social media with propaganda. Furthermore, intra-user and user-to-company communication on social media is now tailorable to an individual’s online habits. For these reasons, social media creates a point of injection for propaganda. State and non-state actors exploit these algorithm-based platforms by hijacking trends and using bots. In this paper, I will analyze social media propaganda mechanisms that State and non-state actors use to gain international exposure. I argue that both groups fuel diametrically opposed narratives to polarize conflicting ideologies. Thus, fueling division and promoting conflict-driven rather than conflict-resolving agendas.

II. Diametrically opposed narratives surrounding conflict leads to disinformation and social division.

Diametrically opposed narratives surrounding war leads to disinformation and widespread polarized perceptions that fuel tension between feuding parties. Today, the internet provides unprecedented access to information from conflict zones. Users get a front row seat to the battles in Ukraine, ISIS’s activities, and the Israeli-Hamas war. On social media, the political messaging surrounding these conflicts is characterized by fundamental disagreements promoted by the parties in each conflict respectively. Therefore, polarization shapes discussions regarding each conflict and disinformation runs rampant on social media platforms. State and non-state actors use bots, hijack trends, and employ divisive rhetoric to push these agendas.

a. State actors create disingenuous narratives on social media to tamper with elections.

the U.S. Congress, a State actor, investigated Russian interference in the 2016 election campaign. The U.S. accused Russia of using trolls and bots to spread misinformation and politically biased information. Trolls are malicious accounts created for the purpose of manipulation. Bots are automated accounts. Both trolls and bots clone or emulate the activity of human users while operating at a much higher pace. For example, they can produce content and follow a scripted agenda. Furthermore, these fake accounts were “created and operated with the primary goal of manipulating public opinion” (for example, promoting divisiveness or conflict on some social or political issue). In 2016, the Russian cyberattacks enhanced malicious information and polarized political conversation, causing confusion and social instability. As a result, Russia’s tampering influenced the public sentiments surrounding the 2021 election’s validity. Furthermore, non-state actors use bots and trends to push their agendas by advocating for their movements and dividing global spectators.

b. Non-state actors use bots and hijack trends to gain international support through widespread exposure.

III. Conclusion

In Conclusion, State and non-state actors use bots, trends, and polarizing rhetoric to push their agendas domestically and internationally. Today, polarization shapes discussions regarding each conflict and disinformation runs rampant on social media platforms. In 2016, the Russian cyberattacks enhanced malicious information and polarized political conversation, causing confusion and social instability. As a result, Russia’s tampering influenced the public sentiments surrounding the 2021 election’s validity. In 2014, the Islamic State (IS) created an app to help them influences trends and spread propaganda across twitter. IS successfully hijacked trends stemming from hashtags related to the World Cup and shifted the narrative surrounding the event throughout the digital community. Furthermore, social media presents a threat to social cohesion and unity because users select the news that they want to see, the algorithm generates relevant content, and malicious actors impose propaganda onto unknowing users. For these reasons, State and non-state actors use social media as a tool for modern information-age warfare.

• #Set ALLOWTOPICVIEW = TWikiAdminGroup, MaxE
• #Set DENYTOPICVIEW = TWikiGuest

Note: TWiki has strict formatting rules for preference declarations. Make sure you preserve the three spaces, asterisk, and extra space at the beginning of these lines. If you wish to give access to any other users simply add them to the comma separated ALLOWTOPICVIEW list.