Computers, Privacy & the Constitution

View   r4  >  r3  >  r2  >  r1
PushkarChaubalFirstPaper 4 - 22 Apr 2024 - Main.EbenMoglen
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="FirstPaper"
Line: 54 to 54
  With Bigtech's storied history of sharing data to both commercial third parties and the US government, it begs the question of the extent to which our psychographic data, harvested from the learnings of short-video platforms, is being reviewed by unfriendly actors. The future looks dire.
Added:
>
>
It wouldn't be so dire if the draft didn't pretty much ignore the fact that platforms provide services to which there are alternatives, so if we want not individually to inhabit the Parasite's form of the future, we can substantially avoid it. Services that are easily federated (email, video-conferencing, messaging, micro-blogging, web hosting, shared document editing, pickup/dropoff through browsers, etc.) can all be offered by us to one another, using hardware so cheap and software so free that 8th graders can learn how to set up families/small businesses, and they can make real money in high school helping people to live very much on the net and absolutely not at all in the Parasite-infected paltforms. With a little browser security, removing ads on the way in and trackers on the way out, such as could be provided by switching to Brave plus AdBlockPlus and NoScript or by using a FreedomBox as a wifi or plugin router at home or work, the human being's endpoint is pretty clean. (It can be made more clean by rebooting into Tails, if the hardware isn't pre-corrupted by the King of the Undead, Now Dead). The services the human being needs are being provided by non-platform non-invasive servers, either her own or operated by people she actually knows and can trust. Some bright young person is able to look after the technical support, and grownups can learn how if they want to. It's all so cheap that anyone can afford it.

So maybe the next draft should leave behind many words we both don't need repeated about the nature of the problem, and a little more analysis of the points at which the technical and social control system of the Parasite could be interfered with and (how surprisingly!) there appears to exist lots of software that can do everything we need in use all over the Net by people who know how and distributions like FreedomBox that make it actually useable by those who don't.

 
You are entitled to restrict access to your paper if you want to. But we all derive immense benefit from reading one another's work, and I hope you won't feel the need unless the subject matter is personal and its disclosure would be harmful or undesirable. To restrict access to your paper simply delete the "#" character on the next two lines:

PushkarChaubalFirstPaper 3 - 02 Mar 2024 - Main.PushkarChaubal
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="FirstPaper"
Line: 7 to 7
 -- By PushkarChaubal - 23 Feb 2024
Changed:
<
<
How incensed would we be if our parents, friends, and lovers divulged our deepest and most intimate secrets?
>
>
How incensed would we be if our parents, friends, or lovers divulged our deepest and most intimate secrets?
 
Changed:
<
<
Everyday, millions of Americans voluntary use platforms from companies like ByteDance? , Meta, and Alphabet. According to Meta, it's raison d'etre is to help people connect, find communities, and grow businesses.
>
>
Millions of Americans voluntarily use platforms from Bytedance, Meta, and Alphabet. According to Meta, it's raison d'etre is to help people connect, find communities, and grow businesses. In doing so, these companies harvest our preferences and emotions, the very essence of our unique beings, and sells them to the highest-paying bidder.
 
Added:
>
>
It is no secret that tech companies have been abusing our data and rendering 4th Amendment protections virtually useless. However, motivated parties, such as marketers and governments, have even more reason to rejoice. The advent of short-form video platforms have made consumers even more attached to their mobile devices. While 50-second dances seem cute and unassuming, they are Bigtech's newest, and most insidious, tool to learn our inner preferences more deeply and keep consumers glued to their platforms.
 
Deleted:
<
<

The Attention Economy Creates Perverse Incentives

 
Changed:
<
<
(Write about the attention Economy)
>
>

Short Video Platforms are the Insidious New Offspring Birthed by the Attention Economy

 
Changed:
<
<

Addictive Short Video Platforms Dramatically Exacerbate Existing Data Privacy Concerns

>
>

The Attention Economy Gives Rise to Perverse Incentives

 
Added:
>
>
Gone are oil and gold as the most sought-after commodity in the world.With endless amounts of content available, technology and media companies are competing to grab our attention. The more viewers a platform can collect, the more attention is sold. This translates into substantial revenue from advertisers and data brokers.Tech platforms like Instagram and Tiktok can sell data elements such as which photos we like, how much time we spend on a website, what we search, and what files we download. 89% of marketers say that Instagram is strategically important to their influencer marketing strategy.
 
Changed:
<
<

Increased Time Spent on the App

>
>
With so much money to be made and to meet Wall Street’s insatiable demand for higher returns, tech companies are pushed to make their cocaine-like digital drugs even more addictive. Just as PepsiCo spends $700 million annually on R&D to make Cheetos more enticing, Bigtech companies aggressively update their platforms with features that increase the amount of time users spend on their app. To increase revenue, it would seem that the perfect elixir for tech companies would be a product that maximizes the amount of time its users’ eyeballs are stuck to the screen, combined with a mechanism that scrapes their deepest consumer preferences, political ideologies, and fundamental desires. That perfect elixir is short-form video platforms such as Bytedance’s Tiktok, Meta’s “Instagram Reels,” and Alphabet’s “YouTube Shorts.”
 
Deleted:
<
<

Learning Intimate Details Abut users

 
Added:
>
>

Increased Time Spent on the App

 
Added:
>
>
Short video platforms feed on our inherent urge for newness. The platforms target our reward systems by featuring 15-60 second snippets of content with bright colors, catchy music, and other eye candy. The constant flow of content creates a dopamine-driven feedback loop, making it hard to stop. The platforms are designed to be endlessly scrollable, with no “tracker” or “progress bar” to tell you how many videos the user has viewed, not unlike casinos lacking windows and clocks. The app “trains users to constantly look for new stimulation.”
 
Deleted:
<
<

Our Intimate Details are Bought and Sold like Commodities

 
Changed:
<
<

Data Elements Collected

>
>

Learning Intimate Details about Users

 
Changed:
<
<

Data Broker Industry

>
>
The secret sauce, however, are the platforms’ dynamic algorithms that quickly understand which content that users are most likely to engage with. In a WSJ investigation, over 100 bot accounts watched 100,000 videos on Tiktok. Within just 2 hours of “normal” use, the app had accurately learned the “personality traits” the investigators secretly assigned the bots. The study demonstrated how Tiktok learns our most hidden interests and emotions and drives users into the radicals of content making it hard to escape. The algorithm learned the bots’ vulnerabilities much faster than other platforms. By gaining a deep understanding of their users, the app pushes people to more extreme content that reinforces their worldview, thus keeping viewers engaged for longer amounts of time than other types of social media. One can only imagine how valuable this deep understanding of users could be to advertisers and foreign governments.
 
Added:
>
>
Even before short-form video platforms, a 2015 study revealed how algorithms can predict more about a person's personality than their loved ones can. It only takes data on 70 “likes”, 150 “likes”, and 300 “likes” for an algorithm to out-predict a user’s friends, family, and spouse, respectively. With exponential advances in machine learning since then, it follows that algorithms can likely predict human personality with far fewer data inputs.
 
Changed:
<
<

Government Seizure of Data

>
>
Compounding the issue, Meta’s “Ads on Reels” program encourages content creators to make videos as eye-catching as possible, with creator revenue directly tied to user engagement with content – as measured by likes, comments, and views.
 
Deleted:
<
<

Data Elements Collected

 
Changed:
<
<

Data Broker Industry

>
>

Our Intimate Details are Sold, Stolen, and Seized Like Commodities

 
Added:
>
>

Data Elements are Collected and Shared

With tech platforms harvesting vast amounts of deeply accurate personal data derived through short-form video platforms, it is natural to wonder how our data is processed. Data elements “traditionally” collected include contact information, call logs, photos, videos, and documents. However, the stakes are even higher now with Tiktok and Meta harvesting deeply intimate psychographic data.

A study in 2018 found Facebook gave 61 3rd party companies the ability to access wide-ranging details about users' friends. A close look at the platforms' terms reveals that these platforms can track location through IP address even when users specifically restrict access to GPS. App data is also shared between affiliates which can include other apps the platform is associated with. Additionally, when firms like Amazon and Apple share user data with third parties, users are bound by the terms of those third parties. When such detailed information is collected from the likes of Tiktok and Instagram Reels, these lax data sharing policies need to be all the more scrutinized.

Tech Companies Routinely Comply with Subpoena Requests

Most of the data collected by Bigtech companies are available for use by law enforcement. The most common and basic request is a subpoena, which can grant the government access to meta data, email addresses, billing location and IP address. Apple and Microsoft routinely comply with subpoenas – in the first half of 2020, Apple complied with 44% of ~6,000 government requests by turning over actual content data.

With Bigtech's storied history of sharing data to both commercial third parties and the US government, it begs the question of the extent to which our psychographic data, harvested from the learnings of short-video platforms, is being reviewed by unfriendly actors. The future looks dire.

 
You are entitled to restrict access to your paper if you want to. But we all derive immense benefit from reading one another's work, and I hope you won't feel the need unless the subject matter is personal and its disclosure would be harmful or undesirable.

PushkarChaubalFirstPaper 2 - 01 Mar 2024 - Main.PushkarChaubal
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="FirstPaper"
Deleted:
<
<
 
Deleted:
<
<
It is strongly recommended that you include your outline in the body of your essay by using the outline as section titles. The headings below are there to remind you how section and subsection titles are formatted.
 
Changed:
<
<

Paper Title

>
>

Spies and Spooks have a new lethal weapon: Short Video Platforms

 -- By PushkarChaubal - 23 Feb 2024
Added:
>
>
How incensed would we be if our parents, friends, and lovers divulged our deepest and most intimate secrets?

Everyday, millions of Americans voluntary use platforms from companies like ByteDance? , Meta, and Alphabet. According to Meta, it's raison d'etre is to help people connect, find communities, and grow businesses.

The Attention Economy Creates Perverse Incentives

(Write about the attention Economy)

 
Changed:
<
<

Section I

>
>

Addictive Short Video Platforms Dramatically Exacerbate Existing Data Privacy Concerns

 
Deleted:
<
<

Subsection A

 
Added:
>
>

Increased Time Spent on the App

 
Changed:
<
<

Subsub 1

>
>

Learning Intimate Details Abut users

 
Deleted:
<
<

Subsection B

 
Changed:
<
<

Subsub 1

>
>

Our Intimate Details are Bought and Sold like Commodities

 
Added:
>
>

Data Elements Collected

 
Changed:
<
<

Subsub 2

>
>

Data Broker Industry

 
Added:
>
>

Government Seizure of Data

 
Changed:
<
<

Section II

>
>

Data Elements Collected

 
Changed:
<
<

Subsection A

>
>

Data Broker Industry

 
Deleted:
<
<

Subsection B

 



PushkarChaubalFirstPaper 1 - 23 Feb 2024 - Main.PushkarChaubal
Line: 1 to 1
Added:
>
>
META TOPICPARENT name="FirstPaper"

It is strongly recommended that you include your outline in the body of your essay by using the outline as section titles. The headings below are there to remind you how section and subsection titles are formatted.

Paper Title

-- By PushkarChaubal - 23 Feb 2024

Section I

Subsection A

Subsub 1

Subsection B

Subsub 1

Subsub 2

Section II

Subsection A

Subsection B


You are entitled to restrict access to your paper if you want to. But we all derive immense benefit from reading one another's work, and I hope you won't feel the need unless the subject matter is personal and its disclosure would be harmful or undesirable. To restrict access to your paper simply delete the "#" character on the next two lines:

Note: TWiki has strict formatting rules for preference declarations. Make sure you preserve the three spaces, asterisk, and extra space at the beginning of these lines. If you wish to give access to any other users simply add them to the comma separated ALLOWTOPICVIEW list.


Revision 4r4 - 22 Apr 2024 - 20:45:21 - EbenMoglen
Revision 3r3 - 02 Mar 2024 - 02:58:14 - PushkarChaubal
Revision 2r2 - 01 Mar 2024 - 18:18:08 - PushkarChaubal
Revision 1r1 - 23 Feb 2024 - 01:54:20 - PushkarChaubal
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform.
All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
All material marked as authored by Eben Moglen is available under the license terms CC-BY-SA version 4.
Syndicate this site RSSATOM